RAJENDRA GANPATI PATIL AND ANR vs AMIT ENTERPRISES HOUSING LTD AND ORS — WP/6035/2026

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 05th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM010212032026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WP/12357/2026

Filing Date

24-04-2026

Registration No

WP/6035/2026

Registration Date

30-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

05th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section NA

Petitioner(s)

RAJENDRA GANPATI PATIL AND ANR

Adv. jaiwant s. chandnani associates

NEELAM RAJENDRA PATIL

Respondent(s)

AMIT ENTERPRISES HOUSING LTD AND ORS

SANJEEV GOVIND PATEL

KISHOR GOVIND PATEL

ROHAN KISHOR PATEL

ABHISHEK JAGMOHANLAL KHANDELWAL

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR

05-05-2026

FRESH ADMISSION

Orders

05-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR

Case Summary: WP 6035/2026 The Bombay High Court partially allowed the writ petition and quashed the trial court's rejection of the petitioners' application to amend their plaint beyond the 14-day period. The High Court found that the Civil Judge erred by overlooking Section 148 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, which permits courts to extend time limits. The case was remitted to the trial court for fresh consideration on merits with proper hearing to both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 6035/2026 The Bombay High Court partially allowed the writ petition and quashed the trial court's rejection of the petitioners' application to amend their plaint beyond the 14-day period. The High Court found that the Civil Judge erred by overlooking Section 148 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, which permits courts to extend time limits. The case was remitted to the trial court for fresh consideration on merits with proper hearing to both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case