BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD vs KAIVAN PARIMAL SHAH AND ANR — WP/6121/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act,1939 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010211622026

Filing Number

WP/12336/2026

Filing Date

24-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/6121/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

Orders passed by Quasi Judicial Authority Other than Labour and Industrial Court ( 105 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act,1939 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD

    Adv. Sarthak S Diwan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KAIVAN PARIMAL SHAH AND ANR

  2. 2.HEERAN P SHAH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. JamadarView PDF

    The Bombay High Court dismissed Bajaj Allianz's writ petition challenging the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's rejection of its application to implead six persons allegedly responsible for a vehicular accident. The court upheld the MACT's decision, holding that this was a case of composite negligence, not contributory negligence, allowing the claimant to proceed against one or more joint tort-feasers without requiring impleadment of all accused persons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

  4. 24-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/6121/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court dismissed Bajaj Allianz's writ petition challenging the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's rejection of its application to implead six persons allegedly responsible for a vehicular accident. The court upheld the MACT's decision, holding that this was a case of composite negligence, not contributory negligence, allowing the claimant to proceed against one or more joint tort-feasers without requiring impleadment of all accused persons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case