DHARMENDRA RAJENDRA GUDADHE vs HARPAL SINGH AND ANR. — FA/1524/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act,1939 Section 173. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010211392025
Filing Number
FA/13549/2025
Filing Date
15-Apr-2025
Registration No
FA/1524/2025
Registration Date
29-Jul-2025
Judge
Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)
Coram
Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)
Bench Type
Single
Category
FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )
Sub-Category
MACP - Single Bench ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DHARMENDRA RAJENDRA GUDADHE
Adv. Varsha Chavan
Respondent(s)
-
1.HARPAL SINGH AND ANR.
-
2.BAJAJ GEN. INS. CO. LTD. MUMBAI
Adv. Sarthak S Diwan
Case History
-
15-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
15-Jun-2026
For Orders (Regular)
Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)
-
06-May-2026
Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)View PDF
Case FA/1524/2025 Summary: The Bombay High Court adjourned the First Appeal on 06/05/2026 after the notice to Respondent No. 1 (Harpal Singh) was returned unserved. The appellant's advocate was given a final two-week opportunity to serve the notice, excluding summer vacation, failing which the appeal will be dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Feb-2026
For Orders (Regular)
Shri. S.R. Agrawal, Registrar(Judl II)
-
23-Dec-2025
Shri. S.R. Agrawal, Registrar(Judl II)View PDF
-
18-Dec-2025
For Orders (Regular)
Shri. S.R. Agrawal, Registrar(Judl II)
-
04-Dec-2025
Shri. S.R. Agrawal, Registrar(Judl II)View PDF
-
02-Sep-2025
For Orders (Spare Copy/Ies Not Supplied)
Shri. S.R. Agrawal, Registrar(Judl II)
-
18-Aug-2025
Shri. S.R. Agrawal, Registrar(Judl II)View PDF
-
18-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Jun-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar DigeView PDF
-
15-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. FA/1524/2025
Case FA/1524/2025 Summary: The Bombay High Court adjourned the First Appeal on 06/05/2026 after the notice to Respondent No. 1 (Harpal Singh) was returned unserved. The appellant's advocate was given a final two-week opportunity to serve the notice, excluding summer vacation, failing which the appeal will be dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts