SHARDUL NILESH THAKUR vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND ANR — WP/5940/2026
Case under Caste Certificate Act 1871 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 04th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010211242026
Filing Number
WP/12306/2026
Filing Date
24-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP/5940/2026
Registration Date
29-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten Shamrao Venegavkar
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten Shamrao Venegavkar
Bench Type
Division
Category
CASTE CERTIFICATE ( 5 )
Sub-Category
ADMISSION ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHARDUL NILESH THAKUR
Adv. Chintamani Kamlakar Bhangoji
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND ANR
-
2.SCHEDULED TRIBE CERTIFICATE SERUTINY COMMITTEE THANE THR. ITS MEMBER SECRETARY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
The Bombay High Court disposed of three consolidated writ petitions by Shardul Nilesh Thakur and others challenging delays in their Scheduled Tribe validity certificate applications. The court directed the competent Scrutiny Committees to complete proceedings and deliver orders by July 31, 2026, noting that paternal relatives had already received such certificates and Vigilance Cell inquiries had been conducted, with liberty for committees to seek time extensions with reasons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Urgent Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten Shamrao Venegavkar
-
24-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/5940/2026
The Bombay High Court disposed of three consolidated writ petitions by Shardul Nilesh Thakur and others challenging delays in their Scheduled Tribe validity certificate applications. The court directed the competent Scrutiny Committees to complete proceedings and deliver orders by July 31, 2026, noting that paternal relatives had already received such certificates and Vigilance Cell inquiries had been conducted, with liberty for committees to seek time extensions with reasons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts