VAIDEHI VAIBHAV THAKUR vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND ANR — WP/5945/2026
Case under Caste Certificate Act 1871 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 04th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010211062026
Filing Number
WP/12295/2026
Filing Date
24-04-2026
Registration No
WP/5945/2026
Registration Date
29-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVINDRA V. GHUGE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HITEN SHAMRAO VENEGAVKAR
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVINDRA V. GHUGE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HITEN SHAMRAO VENEGAVKAR
Bench Type
Division
Category
CASTE CERTIFICATE ( 5 )
Sub-Category
ADMISSION ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
04th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
VAIDEHI VAIBHAV THAKUR
Adv. Chintamani Kamlakar Bhangoji
Respondent(s)
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND ANR
SCHEDULED TRIBE CERTIFICATE SCRUTINY COMMITTEE THANE THR. ITS MEMBER SECRETARY
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVINDRA V. GHUGE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HITEN SHAMRAO VENEGAVKAR
FRESH ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION |
Orders
Summary of WP/5945/2026 The High Court of Bombay disposed of three consolidated writ petitions by petitioners seeking Scheduled Tribe validity certificates whose applications (filed June 4, 2025) were pending before the Scrutiny Committee. The court directed the competent committees to complete proceedings and deliver orders preferably by July 31, 2026, allowing time extensions if justified, noting that paternal relatives had already received similar certificates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of WP/5945/2026 The High Court of Bombay disposed of three consolidated writ petitions by petitioners seeking Scheduled Tribe validity certificates whose applications (filed June 4, 2025) were pending before the Scrutiny Committee. The court directed the competent committees to complete proceedings and deliver orders preferably by July 31, 2026, allowing time extensions if justified, noting that paternal relatives had already received similar certificates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts