MOHAMMED SOHAIL AHMED vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR — WP/2329/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010210902026

Filing Number

WP/8807/2026

Filing Date

24-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/2329/2026

Registration Date

28-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe

Bench Type

Single

Category

CRIMINAL ( 9 )

Sub-Category

Quashing FIR, C.R., Charge Sheet - Crime against Women and Children ( 106 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528
Indian Penal Code (I.p.c) Section 354,509

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOHAMMED SOHAIL AHMED

    Adv. AA SIDDIQUIE ASSOCIATES

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

  2. 2.xyz

    Adv. PANKAJ KANDHARI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. BhobeView PDF

    Case Summary: WP 2329/2026 - Mohammed Sohail Ahmed v. State of Maharashtra The Bombay High Court quashed FIR No. 77/2018 (registered under IPC Sections 354 and 509 for alleged indecent conduct) after the complainant, an airport employee, filed an affidavit confirming amicable settlement with the petitioner-traveler. Finding that continuing proceedings served no useful purpose when both parties had resolved their "miscommunication" and the State raised no objection, Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe allowed the petition subject to costs of Rs. 50,000 each payable to the Bar Council Advocate Aid Fund within three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    For Disposal

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe

  4. 24-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/2329/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 2329/2026 - Mohammed Sohail Ahmed v. State of Maharashtra The Bombay High Court quashed FIR No. 77/2018 (registered under IPC Sections 354 and 509 for alleged indecent conduct) after the complainant, an airport employee, filed an affidavit confirming amicable settlement with the petitioner-traveler. Finding that continuing proceedings served no useful purpose when both parties had resolved their "miscommunication" and the State raised no objection, Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe allowed the petition subject to costs of Rs. 50,000 each payable to the Bar Council Advocate Aid Fund within three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case