GOVIND BABURAO JAGTAP vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR. — IA/1399/2026

Case under Limitation Act Section U/S. Disposed: --Allowed on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010210642026

Filing Number

IA/8795/2026

Filing Date

24-Apr-2026

Registration No

IA/1399/2026

Registration Date

24-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari , Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari , Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata

Bench Type

Division

Category

CRIMINAL ( 9 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--Allowed

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act Section U/S

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVIND BABURAO JAGTAP

    Adv. PAWAN MALI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

  2. 2.SARIKA ANIL JADHAV

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari,hon'ble Justice Kamal KhataView PDF

    Case Summary: IA 1399/2026 The Bombay High Court granted Govind Baburao Jagtap's application to condone a 382-day delay in filing a criminal appeal against his conviction. The court found the delay justified because the applicant, who remained incarcerated since arrest, lacked legal and financial assistance at the time of conviction but subsequently obtained legal aid through the High Court's Legal Aid Committee. The court allowed the application in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. IA/1399/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: IA 1399/2026 The Bombay High Court granted Govind Baburao Jagtap's application to condone a 382-day delay in filing a criminal appeal against his conviction. The court found the delay justified because the applicant, who remained incarcerated since arrest, lacked legal and financial assistance at the time of conviction but subsequently obtained legal aid through the High Court's Legal Aid Committee. The court allowed the application in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case