SHRI. ANIL SOPAN KOLI vs OWNER / MANAGEMENT , M/S. BRIHANS MAHARASTHRA SUGAR Advocate - ARSBaxi, RES 1 — WP/7320/2019
Case under M.r.t.u. & P.u.l.p. Act. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 24th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010210642019
Next Hearing
24th July 2019
Filing Number
WP/12528/2019
Filing Date
23-04-2019
Registration No
WP/7320/2019
Registration Date
01-07-2019
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR
Bench Type
Single
Category
LABOUR MATTERS DB ( 19 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
24th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHRI. ANIL SOPAN KOLI
Adv. HELEKAR NEEL GIRISH
Respondent(s)
OWNER / MANAGEMENT , M/S. BRIHANS MAHARASTHRA SUGAR Advocate - ARSBaxi, RES 1
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR
FOR CIRCULATION
FOR DIRECTION
AT 3.00 P.M.
AT 3.00 P.M.
AT 3.00 P.M.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-07-2019 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 23-04-2026 | FOR DIRECTION |
| 10-04-2026 | AT 3.00 P.M. |
| 27-02-2026 | AT 3.00 P.M. |
| 20-02-2026 | AT 3.00 P.M. |
Orders
CASE SUMMARY: WP/7320/2019 - Anil Sopan Koli v. M/s. Brihans Maharashtra Sugar The Bombay High Court partially allowed the petitioner's writ petition, finding the Labour Court's termination decision legally unsustainable. While the Labour Court had correctly held the dismissal disproportionate and illegal, it improperly denied reinstatement based on alleged "loss of confidence"—a doctrine inapplicable to a driver-cum-peon position lacking fiduciary responsibilities. The court ordered reinstatement with service continuity but denied back wages, considering the petitioner's admitted intermittent employment post-termination and absence of precise wage calculations. The court directed reinstatement within 8 weeks at the Pune office or equivalent establishment, with the ₹50,000 previously withdrawn adjusted against future salary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
CASE SUMMARY: WP/7320/2019 - Anil Sopan Koli v. M/s. Brihans Maharashtra Sugar The Bombay High Court partially allowed the petitioner's writ petition, finding the Labour Court's termination decision legally unsustainable. While the Labour Court had correctly held the dismissal disproportionate and illegal, it improperly denied reinstatement based on alleged "loss of confidence"—a doctrine inapplicable to a driver-cum-peon position lacking fiduciary responsibilities. The court ordered reinstatement with service continuity but denied back wages, considering the petitioner's admitted intermittent employment post-termination and absence of precise wage calculations. The court directed reinstatement within 8 weeks at the Pune office or equivalent establishment, with the ₹50,000 previously withdrawn adjusted against future salary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts