SHRI. ANIL SOPAN KOLI vs OWNER / MANAGEMENT , M/S. BRIHANS MAHARASTHRA SUGAR Advocate - ARSBaxi, RES 1 — WP/7320/2019

Case under M.r.t.u. & P.u.l.p. Act. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 24th April 2026.

CNR: HCBM010210642019

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

24th July 2019

Filing Number

WP/12528/2019

Filing Date

23-04-2019

Registration No

WP/7320/2019

Registration Date

01-07-2019

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR

Bench Type

Single

Category

LABOUR MATTERS DB ( 19 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

24th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

M.r.t.u. & P.u.l.p. Act

Petitioner(s)

SHRI. ANIL SOPAN KOLI

Adv. HELEKAR NEEL GIRISH

Respondent(s)

OWNER / MANAGEMENT , M/S. BRIHANS MAHARASTHRA SUGAR Advocate - ARSBaxi, RES 1

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR

24-07-2019

FOR CIRCULATION

23-04-2026

FOR DIRECTION

10-04-2026

AT 3.00 P.M.

27-02-2026

AT 3.00 P.M.

20-02-2026

AT 3.00 P.M.

Orders

24-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR

CASE SUMMARY: WP/7320/2019 - Anil Sopan Koli v. M/s. Brihans Maharashtra Sugar The Bombay High Court partially allowed the petitioner's writ petition, finding the Labour Court's termination decision legally unsustainable. While the Labour Court had correctly held the dismissal disproportionate and illegal, it improperly denied reinstatement based on alleged "loss of confidence"—a doctrine inapplicable to a driver-cum-peon position lacking fiduciary responsibilities. The court ordered reinstatement with service continuity but denied back wages, considering the petitioner's admitted intermittent employment post-termination and absence of precise wage calculations. The court directed reinstatement within 8 weeks at the Pune office or equivalent establishment, with the ₹50,000 previously withdrawn adjusted against future salary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: WP/7320/2019 - Anil Sopan Koli v. M/s. Brihans Maharashtra Sugar The Bombay High Court partially allowed the petitioner's writ petition, finding the Labour Court's termination decision legally unsustainable. While the Labour Court had correctly held the dismissal disproportionate and illegal, it improperly denied reinstatement based on alleged "loss of confidence"—a doctrine inapplicable to a driver-cum-peon position lacking fiduciary responsibilities. The court ordered reinstatement with service continuity but denied back wages, considering the petitioner's admitted intermittent employment post-termination and absence of precise wage calculations. The court directed reinstatement within 8 weeks at the Pune office or equivalent establishment, with the ₹50,000 previously withdrawn adjusted against future salary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case