DARSHANA ASHISH DESAI vs ASHISH NIRANJAN DESAI Advocate - Indrayani Patani — MCA/137/2026

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 24. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

Next hearing 12-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM010210192026

e-Filing Number

23-04-2026

Filing Number

MCA/12247/2026

Filing Date

23-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCA/137/2026

Registration Date

24-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil

Bench Type

Single

Category

TRANSFER OF CASES WITH IN THE STATE ( 59 )

Sub-Category

SUBORDINATE COURTS ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 24

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DARSHANA ASHISH DESAI

    Adv. Sudhanva S Bedekar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ASHISH NIRANJAN DESAI Advocate - Indrayani Patani

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    For Admission (Misc. CIVIL Application)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil

  3. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. PatilView PDF

    Case Summary: MCA 137/2026 The High Court of Bombay adjourned the matter to 10 June 2026 after the respondent failed to appear. The court granted ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause (b) until the next hearing and directed the applicant's advocate to serve the order on the Family Court Registrar at Nashik. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 08-May-2026

    For Admission (Misc. CIVIL Application)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil

  5. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. PatilView PDF

  6. 07-May-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil

  7. 28-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. PatilView PDF

  8. 28-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 23-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCA/137/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MCA 137/2026 The High Court of Bombay adjourned the matter to 10 June 2026 after the respondent failed to appear. The court granted ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause (b) until the next hearing and directed the applicant's advocate to serve the order on the Family Court Registrar at Nashik. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case