DDSR DREAMWOOD HOUSING SOCIETY LTD vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR GOVT PLEADER AND ORS — WP/6045/2026

Case under Minor Mineral Extraction (Development and Regulation) Rules (Maharashtra) Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010208952026

Filing Number

WP/12183/2026

Filing Date

23-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/6045/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

Bench Type

Single

Category

MINES, MINERAL AND MINING LEASES ( 29 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Minor Mineral Extraction (Development and Regulation) Rules (Maharashtra) Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DDSR DREAMWOOD HOUSING SOCIETY LTD

    Adv. Pinky Mohanlal Bhansali

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR GOVT PLEADER AND ORS

  2. 2.THE TAHSILDAR THANE

  3. 3.COMMISSIONER, NMMC

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. JamadarView PDF

    The Bombay High Court disposed of DDSR Dreamwood Housing Society Ltd.'s writ petition challenging a December 31, 2025 order by the Tahsildar imposing royalty and penalty for unlawful minor mineral excavation. The court directed the Sub-Divisional Officer (SDO) to expeditiously decide the petitioner's pending appeal and, if unable to do so finally, to hear and decide the stay application within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

  4. 23-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/6045/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court disposed of DDSR Dreamwood Housing Society Ltd.'s writ petition challenging a December 31, 2025 order by the Tahsildar imposing royalty and penalty for unlawful minor mineral excavation. The court directed the Sub-Divisional Officer (SDO) to expeditiously decide the petitioner's pending appeal and, if unable to do so finally, to hear and decide the stay application within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case