RARE TOWNSHIPS PRIVATE LIMITED SATYAKI LAW ASSOCIATES vs TIAINLA THAPA — SA/232/2026

Case under Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 Section 58. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM010208302026

e-Filing Number

22-04-2026

Filing Number

SA/12146/2026

Filing Date

23-Apr-2026

Registration No

SA/232/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 Section 58
C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 100

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RARE TOWNSHIPS PRIVATE LIMITED SATYAKI LAW ASSOCIATES

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.TIAINLA THAPA

  2. 2.SAKULEMA THAPA

  3. 3.MOAMONGLA THAPA

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. JamadarView PDF

    Case Summary: In SA 232/2026, the Bombay High Court admitted Rare Townships Pvt. Ltd.'s second appeal against Tiainla Thapa and others, raising substantial questions of law regarding the Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority's review jurisdiction under Regulation 36. The court issued notice to respondents returnable on 17 June 2026 and directed the appellant to file a private paperbook. The case addresses whether the Authority can exercise substantive review powers and whether Regulation 36 exceeds statutory authority under the RERA 2016. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

  4. 23-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. SA/232/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In SA 232/2026, the Bombay High Court admitted Rare Townships Pvt. Ltd.'s second appeal against Tiainla Thapa and others, raising substantial questions of law regarding the Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority's review jurisdiction under Regulation 36. The court issued notice to respondents returnable on 17 June 2026 and directed the appellant to file a private paperbook. The case addresses whether the Authority can exercise substantive review powers and whether Regulation 36 exceeds statutory authority under the RERA 2016. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case