SHARMILA SUNIL GAUD vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SECRETARY, HOME DEPT. AND ANR — HCBM10207902026

Case under Mah. Civil Service(disc., Cond. & Appo.) Rules. Next hearing: 05th May 2026.

Next hearing 05-May-2026

CNR: HCBM010207902026

Filing Number

WP/12117/2026

Filing Date

23-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla , Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla , Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna

Bench Type

Division

Category

OTHER SERVICE MATTERS ( 66 )

Sub-Category

ALL OTHER SERVICE MATTERS - DB ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Mah. Civil Service(disc., Cond. & Appo.) Rules

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHARMILA SUNIL GAUD

    Adv. Aishwarya R Tuwar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SECRETARY, HOME DEPT. AND ANR

  2. 2.MAHARASHTRA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

Case History

  1. 05-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-May-2026

    At 3.00 P.M.

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla , Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla,hon'ble Justice Advait M. SethnaView PDF

    Case Summary: Petitioner Sharmila Sunil Gaud, a practicing advocate, challenged recruitment advertisement for Additional Public Prosecutor posts, seeking age limit relaxation based on her length of bar practice. The Bombay High Court granted ad-interim relief, directing respondents to accept her application by April 24, 2026, finding she exceeded the 38-year age cutoff due to State's delay in initiating recruitment despite a 2019 Supreme Court directive. The petition stands adjourned to May 5, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 23-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 23-Apr-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Petitioner Sharmila Sunil Gaud, a practicing advocate, challenged recruitment advertisement for Additional Public Prosecutor posts, seeking age limit relaxation based on her length of bar practice. The Bombay High Court granted ad-interim relief, directing respondents to accept her application by April 24, 2026, finding she exceeded the 38-year age cutoff due to State's delay in initiating recruitment despite a 2019 Supreme Court directive. The petition stands adjourned to May 5, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case