SHARMILA SUNIL GAUD vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SECRETARY, HOME DEPT. AND ANR — HCBM10207902026

Case under Mah. Civil Service(disc., Cond. & Appo.) Rules Section ---. Next hearing: 05th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM010207902026

Next Hearing

05th May 2026

Filing Number

WP/12117/2026

Filing Date

23-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. I. CHAGLA , HON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. I. CHAGLA , HON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA

Bench Type

Division

Category

OTHER SERVICE MATTERS ( 66 )

Sub-Category

ALL OTHER SERVICE MATTERS - DB ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Mah. Civil Service(Disc., Cond. & Appo.) Rules Section ---

Petitioner(s)

SHARMILA SUNIL GAUD

Adv. Aishwarya R Tuwar

Respondent(s)

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SECRETARY, HOME DEPT. AND ANR

MAHARASHTRA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. I. CHAGLA , HON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA

23-04-2026

AT 3.00 P.M.

05-05-2026

AT 3.00 P.M.

Orders

23-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. I. CHAGLA,HON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA

Case Summary: Petitioner Sharmila Sunil Gaud, a practicing advocate, challenged recruitment advertisement for Additional Public Prosecutor posts, seeking age limit relaxation based on her length of bar practice. The Bombay High Court granted ad-interim relief, directing respondents to accept her application by April 24, 2026, finding she exceeded the 38-year age cutoff due to State's delay in initiating recruitment despite a 2019 Supreme Court directive. The petition stands adjourned to May 5, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Petitioner Sharmila Sunil Gaud, a practicing advocate, challenged recruitment advertisement for Additional Public Prosecutor posts, seeking age limit relaxation based on her length of bar practice. The Bombay High Court granted ad-interim relief, directing respondents to accept her application by April 24, 2026, finding she exceeded the 38-year age cutoff due to State's delay in initiating recruitment despite a 2019 Supreme Court directive. The petition stands adjourned to May 5, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case