KAILAS SOMNATH GAIKWAD vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — WP/2214/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 24th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010207362026

Filing Number

WP/8653/2026

Filing Date

23-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/2214/2026

Registration Date

23-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe

Bench Type

Single

Category

CRIMINAL ( 9 )

Sub-Category

Quashing FIR, C.R., Charge Sheet - Prevention of Corruption Act ( 107 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

24-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 227
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 528
Prevention of Corruption Act Section 7

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KAILAS SOMNATH GAIKWAD

    Adv. Tapan Thatte

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. BhobeView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/2214/2026 Kailas Somnath Gaikwad sought to quash a police custody remand order dated 22 April 2026 issued by the Special Court at Belapur in FIR No.116/2026. However, during hearing, the petitioner's counsel requested withdrawal of the petition with liberty to file appropriate proceedings before the trial court and service-related forums. The State did not object, and the court granted permission to withdraw with all contentions of parties left open. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    At 3.00 P.M.

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe

  4. 23-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. BhobeView PDF

  5. 23-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 23-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/2214/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/2214/2026 Kailas Somnath Gaikwad sought to quash a police custody remand order dated 22 April 2026 issued by the Special Court at Belapur in FIR No.116/2026. However, during hearing, the petitioner's counsel requested withdrawal of the petition with liberty to file appropriate proceedings before the trial court and service-related forums. The State did not object, and the court granted permission to withdraw with all contentions of parties left open. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case