EXPERIO VENTURES THROUGH ITS PARTNER PRATIK GIRISH CHEDDA vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR REVENUE AND FOREST DEPT AND ORS — WP/5965/2026
Case under Mah. Muncipalties Act Section na. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCBM010207292026
Next Hearing
: -
Filing Number
WP/12081/2026
Filing Date
23-04-2026
Registration No
WP/5965/2026
Registration Date
29-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE GAUTAM A. ANKHAD
Coram
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE GAUTAM A. ANKHAD
Bench Type
Division
Category
TOWN PLANNING ( 39 )
Sub-Category
DEVELOPEMENT PERMISSION ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
EXPERIO VENTURES THROUGH ITS PARTNER PRATIK GIRISH CHEDDA
Adv. Jeetenndra Sachddev
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR REVENUE AND FOREST DEPT AND ORS
THE COLLECTOR OF THANE DISTRICT
THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER THANE DIVISION THANE
THE TAHSILDAR THANE
THE TALATHI SAJA BELAPUR
THE CIRCLE OFFICER BELAPUR
NAVI MUMBAI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION NMMC HEADQUARTER
Adv. Tejesh Dande
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR TOWN PLANNING NAVI MUMBAI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
Adv. Tejesh Dande
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE GAUTAM A. ANKHAD
FOR CIRCULATION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
Orders
Case Summary - WP 5965/2026: The writ petition filed by Experio Ventures against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents (Collector of Thane District and Sub-Divisional Officer) was not heard on 6th May 2026 due to paucity of time and heavy board matters. The case was adjourned with liberty granted to the petitioner to move the matter before the Vacation Bench for hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary - WP 5965/2026: The writ petition filed by Experio Ventures against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents (Collector of Thane District and Sub-Divisional Officer) was not heard on 6th May 2026 due to paucity of time and heavy board matters. The case was adjourned with liberty granted to the petitioner to move the matter before the Vacation Bench for hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts