EXPERIO VENTURES THROUGH ITS PARTNER PRATIK GIRISH CHEDDA vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR REVENUE AND FOREST DEPT AND ORS — WP/5965/2026
Case under Mah. Muncipalties Act Section na. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCBM010207292026
Filing Number
WP/12081/2026
Filing Date
23-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP/5965/2026
Registration Date
29-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. Ankhad
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. Ankhad
Bench Type
Division
Category
TOWN PLANNING ( 39 )
Sub-Category
DEVELOPEMENT PERMISSION ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.EXPERIO VENTURES THROUGH ITS PARTNER PRATIK GIRISH CHEDDA
Adv. Jeetenndra Sachddev
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR REVENUE AND FOREST DEPT AND ORS
-
2.THE COLLECTOR OF THANE DISTRICT
-
3.THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER THANE DIVISION THANE
-
4.THE TAHSILDAR THANE
-
5.THE TALATHI SAJA BELAPUR
-
6.THE CIRCLE OFFICER BELAPUR
-
7.NAVI MUMBAI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION NMMC HEADQUARTER
Adv. Tejesh Dande
-
8.ASSISTANT DIRECTOR TOWN PLANNING NAVI MUMBAI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
Adv. Tejesh Dande
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. AnkhadView PDF
Case Summary - WP 5965/2026: The writ petition filed by Experio Ventures against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents (Collector of Thane District and Sub-Divisional Officer) was not heard on 6th May 2026 due to paucity of time and heavy board matters. The case was adjourned with liberty granted to the petitioner to move the matter before the Vacation Bench for hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
For Circulation
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. Ankhad
-
23-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/5965/2026
Case Summary - WP 5965/2026: The writ petition filed by Experio Ventures against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents (Collector of Thane District and Sub-Divisional Officer) was not heard on 6th May 2026 due to paucity of time and heavy board matters. The case was adjourned with liberty granted to the petitioner to move the matter before the Vacation Bench for hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts