YASHI KUMARI JADEJA vs UTTAM PARMAR — WP/5687/2026

Case under Bombay Rent Act 1947 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 04th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM010205552026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WP/11982/2026

Filing Date

22-04-2026

Registration No

WP/5687/2026

Registration Date

24-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE

Bench Type

Single

Category

RENT ACT ( 34 )

Sub-Category

ARREARS OF RENT ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

04th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

Bombay Rent Act 1947 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

YASHI KUMARI JADEJA

Adv. SB

Respondent(s)

UTTAM PARMAR

HIROO PARMAR

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE

27-04-2026

FOR CIRCULATION

04-05-2026

FOR DIRECTION

Orders

04-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE

Case Summary: WP/5687/2026 Court Decision: The High Court of Bombay dismissed Yashi Kumari Jadeja's writ petition challenging an eviction order dated 30 December 2024 under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act. The court held that the Rent Control Authority properly exercised jurisdiction under Section 24 to order eviction, as the petitioner's occupation under a Leave & License Agreement was admitted, and the license period had expired. The court rejected the petitioner's argument that an interim protection order from a parallel civil suit prevented the eviction proceedings. Key Reasoning: The court found the petition defective for failing to challenge the Revisional Authority's rejection of the delay condonation application. Additionally, the court criticized the petitioner for bad faith conduct—having assured the court on 27 April 2026 that she would vacate within 6 months to prevent dismissal, then engaging new counsel to argue the opposite, thereby wasting judicial time. The petition was dismissed with exemplary costs of Rs. 1,00,000 imposed on the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/5687/2026 Court Decision: The High Court of Bombay dismissed Yashi Kumari Jadeja's writ petition challenging an eviction order dated 30 December 2024 under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act. The court held that the Rent Control Authority properly exercised jurisdiction under Section 24 to order eviction, as the petitioner's occupation under a Leave & License Agreement was admitted, and the license period had expired. The court rejected the petitioner's argument that an interim protection order from a parallel civil suit prevented the eviction proceedings. Key Reasoning: The court found the petition defective for failing to challenge the Revisional Authority's rejection of the delay condonation application. Additionally, the court criticized the petitioner for bad faith conduct—having assured the court on 27 April 2026 that she would vacate within 6 months to prevent dismissal, then engaging new counsel to argue the opposite, thereby wasting judicial time. The petition was dismissed with exemplary costs of Rs. 1,00,000 imposed on the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case