YASHI KUMARI JADEJA vs UTTAM PARMAR — WP/5687/2026
Case under Bombay Rent Act 1947 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 04th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010205552026
Filing Number
WP/11982/2026
Filing Date
22-04-2026
Registration No
WP/5687/2026
Registration Date
24-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE
Bench Type
Single
Category
RENT ACT ( 34 )
Sub-Category
ARREARS OF RENT ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
04th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
YASHI KUMARI JADEJA
Adv. SB
Respondent(s)
UTTAM PARMAR
HIROO PARMAR
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE
FOR CIRCULATION
FOR DIRECTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 04-05-2026 | FOR DIRECTION |
Orders
Case Summary: WP/5687/2026 Court Decision: The High Court of Bombay dismissed Yashi Kumari Jadeja's writ petition challenging an eviction order dated 30 December 2024 under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act. The court held that the Rent Control Authority properly exercised jurisdiction under Section 24 to order eviction, as the petitioner's occupation under a Leave & License Agreement was admitted, and the license period had expired. The court rejected the petitioner's argument that an interim protection order from a parallel civil suit prevented the eviction proceedings. Key Reasoning: The court found the petition defective for failing to challenge the Revisional Authority's rejection of the delay condonation application. Additionally, the court criticized the petitioner for bad faith conduct—having assured the court on 27 April 2026 that she would vacate within 6 months to prevent dismissal, then engaging new counsel to argue the opposite, thereby wasting judicial time. The petition was dismissed with exemplary costs of Rs. 1,00,000 imposed on the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP/5687/2026 Court Decision: The High Court of Bombay dismissed Yashi Kumari Jadeja's writ petition challenging an eviction order dated 30 December 2024 under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act. The court held that the Rent Control Authority properly exercised jurisdiction under Section 24 to order eviction, as the petitioner's occupation under a Leave & License Agreement was admitted, and the license period had expired. The court rejected the petitioner's argument that an interim protection order from a parallel civil suit prevented the eviction proceedings. Key Reasoning: The court found the petition defective for failing to challenge the Revisional Authority's rejection of the delay condonation application. Additionally, the court criticized the petitioner for bad faith conduct—having assured the court on 27 April 2026 that she would vacate within 6 months to prevent dismissal, then engaging new counsel to argue the opposite, thereby wasting judicial time. The petition was dismissed with exemplary costs of Rs. 1,00,000 imposed on the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts