CHHAGAN KISAN KHAMGAL AND ORS vs SITARAM SADASHIV CHORMALE AND ORS — WP/6046/2026
Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 05th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010204772026
Filing Number
WP/11928/2026
Filing Date
22-04-2026
Registration No
WP/6046/2026
Registration Date
30-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR
Bench Type
Single
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )
Sub-Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 11 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
05th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
CHHAGAN KISAN KHAMGAL AND ORS
Adv. sushant prabhune
ANNA NAMDEV KHAMGAL
HARIDAS DASHRATH BANDGAR
BAYDABAI RAMCHANDRA BANDGAR
BAPU RAMCHANDRA BANDGAR
NATI RAMCHANDRA BANDGAR
Respondent(s)
SITARAM SADASHIV CHORMALE AND ORS
MAHIPATI SADASHIV CHORMALE
NARAYAN DAGDU KISWE
BHIMRAO DAGDU KISWE
VIMAL UTTAM KHAMGAL (LEGAL HEIR REPRESENTATING THE DECEASED)(Legal Heir)5.
ABHIMAN UTTAM KHAMGAL5.
SANGITA PRAKASH TILE5.
KUSUM BALU TAKALE5.
VAISHALI BHAGWAT KOKARE
PHULABAI MARUTI SHENDGE (HEIR REPRESENTING THE DECEASED)(Legal Heir)6.
KERBA MARUTI SHENDGE6.
NARAYAN MARUTI SHENDGE
MAHIPATI SADASHIV CHORMALE
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR
FRESH ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION |
Orders
Case Summary: WP/6046/2026 The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a lower court's order that corrected an inadvertent omission in a 2006 partition decree. The original judgment had determined co-sharers' shares in paragraph 25 but failed to specify defendant co-sharers' shares in the operative decree; the Civil Judge properly exercised power under Section 152 CPC to rectify this clerical error. The court upheld the correction, holding that all defendant co-sharers except one (who had sold their share) were entitled to the same relief as plaintiffs regarding property allotment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP/6046/2026 The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a lower court's order that corrected an inadvertent omission in a 2006 partition decree. The original judgment had determined co-sharers' shares in paragraph 25 but failed to specify defendant co-sharers' shares in the operative decree; the Civil Judge properly exercised power under Section 152 CPC to rectify this clerical error. The court upheld the correction, holding that all defendant co-sharers except one (who had sold their share) were entitled to the same relief as plaintiffs regarding property allotment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts