CHHAGAN KISAN KHAMGAL AND ORS vs SITARAM SADASHIV CHORMALE AND ORS — WP/6046/2026

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 05th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM010204772026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WP/11928/2026

Filing Date

22-04-2026

Registration No

WP/6046/2026

Registration Date

30-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

05th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section NA

Petitioner(s)

CHHAGAN KISAN KHAMGAL AND ORS

Adv. sushant prabhune

ANNA NAMDEV KHAMGAL

HARIDAS DASHRATH BANDGAR

BAYDABAI RAMCHANDRA BANDGAR

BAPU RAMCHANDRA BANDGAR

NATI RAMCHANDRA BANDGAR

Respondent(s)

SITARAM SADASHIV CHORMALE AND ORS

MAHIPATI SADASHIV CHORMALE

NARAYAN DAGDU KISWE

BHIMRAO DAGDU KISWE

VIMAL UTTAM KHAMGAL (LEGAL HEIR REPRESENTATING THE DECEASED)(Legal Heir)5.

ABHIMAN UTTAM KHAMGAL5.

SANGITA PRAKASH TILE5.

KUSUM BALU TAKALE5.

VAISHALI BHAGWAT KOKARE

PHULABAI MARUTI SHENDGE (HEIR REPRESENTING THE DECEASED)(Legal Heir)6.

KERBA MARUTI SHENDGE6.

NARAYAN MARUTI SHENDGE

MAHIPATI SADASHIV CHORMALE

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR

05-05-2026

FRESH ADMISSION

Orders

05-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR

Case Summary: WP/6046/2026 The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a lower court's order that corrected an inadvertent omission in a 2006 partition decree. The original judgment had determined co-sharers' shares in paragraph 25 but failed to specify defendant co-sharers' shares in the operative decree; the Civil Judge properly exercised power under Section 152 CPC to rectify this clerical error. The court upheld the correction, holding that all defendant co-sharers except one (who had sold their share) were entitled to the same relief as plaintiffs regarding property allotment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/6046/2026 The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a lower court's order that corrected an inadvertent omission in a 2006 partition decree. The original judgment had determined co-sharers' shares in paragraph 25 but failed to specify defendant co-sharers' shares in the operative decree; the Civil Judge properly exercised power under Section 152 CPC to rectify this clerical error. The court upheld the correction, holding that all defendant co-sharers except one (who had sold their share) were entitled to the same relief as plaintiffs regarding property allotment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case