CHHAGAN KISAN KHAMGAL AND ORS vs SITARAM SADASHIV CHORMALE AND ORS — WP/6046/2026

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010204772026

Filing Number

WP/11928/2026

Filing Date

22-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/6046/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHHAGAN KISAN KHAMGAL AND ORS

    Adv. sushant prabhune

  2. 2.ANNA NAMDEV KHAMGAL

  3. 3.HARIDAS DASHRATH BANDGAR

  4. 4.BAYDABAI RAMCHANDRA BANDGAR

  5. 5.BAPU RAMCHANDRA BANDGAR

  6. 6.NATI RAMCHANDRA BANDGAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SITARAM SADASHIV CHORMALE AND ORS

  2. 2.MAHIPATI SADASHIV CHORMALE

  3. 3.NARAYAN DAGDU KISWE

  4. 4.BHIMRAO DAGDU KISWE

  5. 5.VIMAL UTTAM KHAMGAL (LEGAL HEIR REPRESENTATING THE DECEASED)(Legal Heir)5.

  6. 6.ABHIMAN UTTAM KHAMGAL5.

  7. 7.SANGITA PRAKASH TILE5.

  8. 8.KUSUM BALU TAKALE5.

  9. 9.VAISHALI BHAGWAT KOKARE

  10. 10.PHULABAI MARUTI SHENDGE (HEIR REPRESENTING THE DECEASED)(Legal Heir)6.

  11. 11.KERBA MARUTI SHENDGE6.

  12. 12.NARAYAN MARUTI SHENDGE

  13. 13.MAHIPATI SADASHIV CHORMALE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. JamadarView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/6046/2026 The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a lower court's order that corrected an inadvertent omission in a 2006 partition decree. The original judgment had determined co-sharers' shares in paragraph 25 but failed to specify defendant co-sharers' shares in the operative decree; the Civil Judge properly exercised power under Section 152 CPC to rectify this clerical error. The court upheld the correction, holding that all defendant co-sharers except one (who had sold their share) were entitled to the same relief as plaintiffs regarding property allotment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

  4. 22-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/6046/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/6046/2026 The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a lower court's order that corrected an inadvertent omission in a 2006 partition decree. The original judgment had determined co-sharers' shares in paragraph 25 but failed to specify defendant co-sharers' shares in the operative decree; the Civil Judge properly exercised power under Section 152 CPC to rectify this clerical error. The court upheld the correction, holding that all defendant co-sharers except one (who had sold their share) were entitled to the same relief as plaintiffs regarding property allotment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case