MANOJ DATTATRAY MESTRY vs ALIYA FAIZAL AGARBATTIWALA AND ANR — WP/5929/2026
Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010204662026
Filing Number
WP/11920/2026
Filing Date
22-04-2026
Registration No
WP/5929/2026
Registration Date
29-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR
Bench Type
Single
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )
Sub-Category
Orders passed by Quasi Judicial Authority Other than Labour and Industrial Court ( 105 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
08th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MANOJ DATTATRAY MESTRY
Adv. PINTUSINGH
Respondent(s)
ALIYA FAIZAL AGARBATTIWALA AND ANR
SUHEL MOHAMMAD HUSSAIN AGARBATTIWALA
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR
FRESH ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION |
Orders
In WP/5929/2026, the Bombay High Court heard petitioner Manoj Dattatray Mestry's plea for expeditious disposal of execution petitions against respondents Aliya Faizal Agarbattiwalla and Anr. The court directed the executing court to decide the execution petitions as expeditiously as possible, following Supreme Court precedent in Rahul S Shah v. Jinendra Kumar Gandhi, and disposed of both related writ petitions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
In WP/5929/2026, the Bombay High Court heard petitioner Manoj Dattatray Mestry's plea for expeditious disposal of execution petitions against respondents Aliya Faizal Agarbattiwalla and Anr. The court directed the executing court to decide the execution petitions as expeditiously as possible, following Supreme Court precedent in Rahul S Shah v. Jinendra Kumar Gandhi, and disposed of both related writ petitions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts