KAJAL SUNIL WADIKAR vs THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COLLECTOR ( ADDITIONAL/NUINSANCE) AND ORS — WP/5808/2026

Case under Mah. Slum Areas Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 06th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM010203442026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WP/11854/2026

Filing Date

21-04-2026

Registration No

WP/5808/2026

Registration Date

28-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK

Bench Type

Division

Category

SLUM AREAS ( 49 )

Sub-Category

SLUM AREAS ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

06th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

Mah. Slum Areas Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

KAJAL SUNIL WADIKAR

Adv. Puja bhatta

Respondent(s)

THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COLLECTOR ( ADDITIONAL/NUINSANCE) AND ORS

COMPETENT AUTHORITY-6, SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY

WHITE BERRY BUILDER TECH LTD

SECRETARY/CHAIRMAN

APPELLATE AUTHORITY

VAISHALI PRAMOD JADHAV

VANDANA WADIKAR

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK

06-05-2026

FRESH ADMISSION

Orders

06-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK

The Bombay High Court dismissed Kajal Sunil Wadikar's writ petition against the Additional District Collector and others, finding that an efficacious statutory remedy existed before the AGRC (Appellate Grievance Redressal Committee). The court declined to set aside the impugned order and instead granted liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal before the AGRC within two weeks, requesting expeditious disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court dismissed Kajal Sunil Wadikar's writ petition against the Additional District Collector and others, finding that an efficacious statutory remedy existed before the AGRC (Appellate Grievance Redressal Committee). The court declined to set aside the impugned order and instead granted liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal before the AGRC within two weeks, requesting expeditious disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case