BHARATI SINGH SHRI. P. D. DESAI vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — WP/1906/2012

Case under Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc). Disposed: --Allowed on 29th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 12-Dec-1212

CNR: HCBM010202662012

Filing Number

WP/1906/2012

Filing Date

10-May-2012

Registration No

WP/1906/2012

Registration Date

10-May-2012

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

29-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--Allowed

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc)
Indian Penal Code (I.p.c)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHARATI SINGH SHRI. P. D. DESAI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

  2. 2.MD IMBRAN DADANI RASABI (AS PER ORDER DT. 18.03.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 29-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

    Summary The Bombay High Court quashed an FIR against TV personalities Shekhar Suman and Bharati Singh for allegedly insulting religious feelings through a comedy show episode. The court held that Section 295-A of the IPC requires deliberate and malicious intention to outrage religious feelings, which was absent here since the words used ("Ya Allah! Rasgulla! Dahi Bhalla!") were merely comic rhyming expressions in an entertainment context, not targeted insults. Additionally, the court found that mandatory government sanction under Section 196 CrPC was not obtained before prosecution, rendering the proceedings legally infirm. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-Apr-2026

    Bottom Of Board-

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

  4. 22-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  5. 22-Apr-2026

    Bottom Of Board-

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

  6. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  7. 15-Apr-2026

    Bottom Of Board-

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

  8. 18-Mar-2026

    Bottom Of Board-

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

  9. 11-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  10. 20-Feb-2024

    Revoked

    Registrar (Judicial - I)

  11. 08-Jan-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari,hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. ChandakView PDF

  12. 03-Sep-2021

    For Admission - Fresh [Criminal Side Matters]

    According To Sitting List

  13. 03-Nov-2014

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Anuja Prabhudessai,hon'ble Shri Justice V.M. KanadeView PDF

  14. 17-Apr-2014

    Criminal Pil (Pre-Admission Matters)

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Anuja Prabhudessai , Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh H. Patil

  15. 13-Mar-2014

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Anuja Prabhudessai,hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh H. PatilView PDF

  16. 13-Mar-2014

    Criminal Pil (Pre-Admission Matters)

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Anuja Prabhudessai , Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh H. Patil

  17. 11-Dec-2012

    For Hearing & Final Disposal

    Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Oka , Hon'ble Shri Justice S.S. Shinde

  18. 01-Nov-2012

    For Hearing & Final Disposal

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice S.S. Jadhav , Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Oka

  19. 25-Sep-2012

    For Hearing & Final Disposal

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice S.S. Jadhav , Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Oka

  20. 23-Aug-2012

    For Hearing & Final Disposal

    Hon'ble Shri Justice A.M. Khanwilkar , Hon'ble Shri Justice R.Y. Ganoo

  21. 24-Jul-2012

    For Admission - Fresh

    Hon'ble Shri Justice A.M. Khanwilkar , Hon'ble Shri Justice A.R. Joshi

  22. 18-Jun-2012

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  23. 10-May-2012

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/1906/2012

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Bombay High Court quashed an FIR against TV personalities Shekhar Suman and Bharati Singh for allegedly insulting religious feelings through a comedy show episode. The court held that Section 295-A of the IPC requires deliberate and malicious intention to outrage religious feelings, which was absent here since the words used ("Ya Allah! Rasgulla! Dahi Bhalla!") were merely comic rhyming expressions in an entertainment context, not targeted insults. Additionally, the court found that mandatory government sanction under Section 196 CrPC was not obtained before prosecution, rendering the proceedings legally infirm. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case