AMOL KASHINATH GAWADE vs THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER UNION BANK OF INDIA AND ORS — IA/3185/2026

Case under Securitisation & Reconstruction of Finiancial Assets Act Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 23rd April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010202242026

Filing Number

IA/11768/2026

Filing Date

21-Apr-2026

Registration No

IA/3185/2026

Registration Date

22-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

Bench Type

Division

Category

MERCANTILE LAWS COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS , BANKS ( 28 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO SECURITISATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS ( 10 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

23-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Securitisation & Reconstruction of Finiancial Assets Act Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AMOL KASHINATH GAWADE

    Adv. Ronak Shah

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER UNION BANK OF INDIA AND ORS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF

    The Bombay High Court granted an extension of eight weeks to the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai (DRAT) to decide Interim Application No.165 of 2026 in Regular Appeal No.8 of 2026. The extension was sought jointly by all parties after the DRAT's hearing was part-heard, citing the unavailability of the DRAT Chairperson for a period in the near future. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. IA/3185/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court granted an extension of eight weeks to the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai (DRAT) to decide Interim Application No.165 of 2026 in Regular Appeal No.8 of 2026. The extension was sought jointly by all parties after the DRAT's hearing was part-heard, citing the unavailability of the DRAT Chairperson for a period in the near future. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case