M/S. BALASAHEB PATIL AND ASSOCIATES THR. ITS PROP. BALASAHEB BABURAO PATIL vs THE UNION OF INDIA THR THE SEC. MINISTRY OF FINANCE, DEPT. OF REVENUE AND ANR — WP/5938/2026

Case under Customs Act, 1962 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010200562026

Filing Number

WP/11669/2026

Filing Date

20-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/5938/2026

Registration Date

29-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. Ankhad

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. Ankhad

Bench Type

Division

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Customs Act, 1962 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S. BALASAHEB PATIL AND ASSOCIATES THR. ITS PROP. BALASAHEB BABURAO PATIL

    Adv. AMEY DESHPANDE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE UNION OF INDIA THR THE SEC. MINISTRY OF FINANCE, DEPT. OF REVENUE AND ANR

  2. 2.THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER CGST AND CENTRAL EXCISE NASHIK DIVISION

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. AnkhadView PDF

    Summary The High Court of Bombay dismissed the writ petition filed by M/s. Balasaheb Patil & Associates challenging a GST attachment and possession order on their Nashik property. The petitioner's counsel sought withdrawal of the petition with liberty to file appropriate proceedings, which the court granted by dismissing the writ petition as withdrawn. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. Ankhad

  4. 20-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/5938/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Bombay dismissed the writ petition filed by M/s. Balasaheb Patil & Associates challenging a GST attachment and possession order on their Nashik property. The petitioner's counsel sought withdrawal of the petition with liberty to file appropriate proceedings, which the court granted by dismissing the writ petition as withdrawn. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case