AXIS BANK LTD. vs REGISTRAR CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE — WP/5958/2026
Case under Securitisation & Reconstruction of Finiancial Assets Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 05th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010199762026
Filing Number
WP/11622/2026
Filing Date
20-04-2026
Registration No
WP/5958/2026
Registration Date
29-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
Bench Type
Division
Category
MERCANTILE LAWS COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS , BANKS ( 28 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS RELATING TO SECURITISATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS ( 10 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
05th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
AXIS BANK LTD.
Adv. Alok D Mishra
Respondent(s)
REGISTRAR CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
FRESH ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION |
Orders
Case Summary: Axis Bank Limited v. Registrar, Chief Judicial Magistrate (WP 5958/2026) Axis Bank, a secured creditor, petitioned the Bombay High Court challenging the delay in issuing a Writ of Commission following a Magistrate's order dated 27.01.2026 granting the bank's application under Section 14 of the Securitisation Act, 2002. The court held that failure to issue the Writ frustrated the order's purpose and violated the four-week implementation deadline established in prior precedent. The court directed the Registrar to issue the Writ of Commission within one week. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Axis Bank Limited v. Registrar, Chief Judicial Magistrate (WP 5958/2026) Axis Bank, a secured creditor, petitioned the Bombay High Court challenging the delay in issuing a Writ of Commission following a Magistrate's order dated 27.01.2026 granting the bank's application under Section 14 of the Securitisation Act, 2002. The court held that failure to issue the Writ frustrated the order's purpose and violated the four-week implementation deadline established in prior precedent. The court directed the Registrar to issue the Writ of Commission within one week. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts