ANIL BABULAL CHOKHARA vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE AND ANR — IA/1321/2026

Case under Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 439. Disposed: Contested--Partly Allowed on 06th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM010199722026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

IA/8354/2026

Filing Date

20-04-2026

Registration No

IA/1321/2026

Registration Date

20-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI

Bench Type

Single

Category

BAIL ( 51 )

Sub-Category

Modification ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

06th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Partly Allowed

Acts & Sections

Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 439

Petitioner(s)

ANIL BABULAL CHOKHARA

Adv. Sujit Sahoo

Respondent(s)

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE AND ANR

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI

06-05-2026

FOR CIRCULATION -1

Orders

06-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI

Summary The Bombay High Court partly allowed Anil Babulal Chokhara's application to modify bail conditions imposed on March 10, 2025. The court removed condition (iv) requiring trial court permission for domestic travel, finding it unnecessary since the applicant regularly attends trial proceedings. However, the court upheld condition (vi) restricting international travel, noting the applicant had only left Maharashtra once in the preceding year, causing minimal inconvenience, and that trial court permission remains mandatory for any travel outside Maharashtra regardless of other orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Bombay High Court partly allowed Anil Babulal Chokhara's application to modify bail conditions imposed on March 10, 2025. The court removed condition (iv) requiring trial court permission for domestic travel, finding it unnecessary since the applicant regularly attends trial proceedings. However, the court upheld condition (vi) restricting international travel, noting the applicant had only left Maharashtra once in the preceding year, causing minimal inconvenience, and that trial court permission remains mandatory for any travel outside Maharashtra regardless of other orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case