VAIBHAV YADVARAO DEORE AND ORS vs JAGANNATH SHRAVAN PATIL AND ORS — WP/6078/2026

Case under The Maharashtra Money-lending Regulation Act,2014 Section NA. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.

Next hearing 22-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM010199342026

Filing Number

WP/11594/2026

Filing Date

20-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/6078/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

Bench Type

Single

Category

MERCANTILE LAWS COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS , BANKS ( 28 )

Sub-Category

MONEY LENDING ( 12 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

The Maharashtra Money-lending Regulation Act,2014 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VAIBHAV YADVARAO DEORE AND ORS

    Adv. Akshay Bankapur

  2. 2.SONAL VAIBHAV DEORE

  3. 3.SEEMA NAMDEO PAWAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JAGANNATH SHRAVAN PATIL AND ORS

  2. 2.TANVI JAGANNATH PATIL

  3. 3.THE LD. DIVISIONAL JOINT REGISTRAR

  4. 4.THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR AND DISTRICT DEPUTY REGISTRAR

  5. 5.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Case History

  1. 22-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 22-Jun-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

  3. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. JamadarView PDF

    Case Summary: WP 6078/2026 The Bombay High Court found an arguable case merited consideration and issued notice to respondents returnable on 22nd June 2026. Petitioners must serve respondents with private notice and file an affidavit of service; the State's counsel waived service on behalf of state respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 04-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 20-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/6078/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 6078/2026 The Bombay High Court found an arguable case merited consideration and issued notice to respondents returnable on 22nd June 2026. Petitioners must serve respondents with private notice and file an affidavit of service; the State's counsel waived service on behalf of state respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case