The Director Finance Maharashtra Stale Elcclricity Distribution Company Limited AND ORS M V Kini and co vs Ravinclra Yaclavrao Gaikwacl — WP/6743/2026

Case under Electricity (Supply) Act Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 11th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010199162026

e-Filing Number

18-04-2026

Filing Number

WP/11582/2026

Filing Date

18-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/6743/2026

Registration Date

21-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

Bench Type

Single

Category

LABOUR MATTERS SINGLE BENCH ( 65 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 13 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

11-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Electricity (Supply) Act Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The Director Finance Maharashtra Stale Elcclricity Distribution Company Limited AND ORS M V Kini and co

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ravinclra Yaclavrao Gaikwacl

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF

    The Bombay High Court rejected the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company's writ petition challenging the Industrial Court's order that cancelled the respondent's transfer and restored his seniority. The court found the employer's refusal to cancel the respondent's 2019 transfer request (made on grounds of mother's illness) discriminatory, since similar cancellation was granted to another employee in identical circumstances, warranting equal treatment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Jun-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

  4. 18-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/6743/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court rejected the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company's writ petition challenging the Industrial Court's order that cancelled the respondent's transfer and restored his seniority. The court found the employer's refusal to cancel the respondent's 2019 transfer request (made on grounds of mother's illness) discriminatory, since similar cancellation was granted to another employee in identical circumstances, warranting equal treatment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case