PNB Housing Finance Limited vs State or Maharashtra — WP/5995/2026
Case under Securitisation & Reconstruction of Finiancial Assets Act Section 14. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010199142026
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
e-Filing Number
17-04-2026
Filing Number
WP/11580/2026
Filing Date
18-04-2026
Registration No
WP/5995/2026
Registration Date
29-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
Bench Type
Division
Category
MERCANTILE LAWS COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS , BANKS ( 28 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS RELATING TO SECURITISATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS ( 10 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PNB Housing Finance Limited
Adv. SMIT SHAH
Respondent(s)
State or Maharashtra
The District Magistrate of Thane
The Tahsildar Thane
The Police Inspector
Deepali Dilip Pawar
Dilip Ragharao Pawar
Leela Pawar
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
FRESH ADMISSION
FOR COMPLIANCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION |
| 16-06-2026 | FOR COMPLIANCE |
Orders
Case Summary: WP/5995/2026 The Bombay High Court allowed PNB Housing Finance Limited's petition and directed the Tahsildar of Thane to take physical possession of a secured asset on 20th May 2026, with police assistance authorized to use reasonable force if necessary. The court found that borrowers had illegally trespassed into the property after the petitioner's lawful possession under SARFAESI Act, frustrating the statute's object, and ordered compliance by 16th June 2026 with personal presence mandated for non-compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP/5995/2026 The Bombay High Court allowed PNB Housing Finance Limited's petition and directed the Tahsildar of Thane to take physical possession of a secured asset on 20th May 2026, with police assistance authorized to use reasonable force if necessary. The court found that borrowers had illegally trespassed into the property after the petitioner's lawful possession under SARFAESI Act, frustrating the statute's object, and ordered compliance by 16th June 2026 with personal presence mandated for non-compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts