DEEPAK SHAMJI NEGANDHI THROUGH POA BINDU NEGHANDHI vs ASHISH DINESH PARIKH — CP/259/2026
Case under Contempt of Courts Act Section .15. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 05th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010197972026
e-Filing Number
17-04-2026
Filing Number
CP/11521/2026
Filing Date
18-04-2026
Registration No
CP/259/2026
Registration Date
23-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE
Bench Type
Single
Category
CONTEMPT OF COURT ( 8 )
Sub-Category
CIVIL CONTEMPT ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
05th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DEEPAK SHAMJI NEGANDHI THROUGH POA BINDU NEGHANDHI
Adv. KHANJAVEDAKHTAR
Respondent(s)
ASHISH DINESH PARIKH
FALGUNI ASHISH PAREKH
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE
FOR CIRCULATION
FOR DIRECTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 05-05-2026 | FOR DIRECTION |
Orders
The Bombay High Court disposed of the contempt petition, finding no obstruction by respondents regarding flat occupation. The court directed the City Civil Court registry to accept deposit of arrears in monthly compensation (June 2025-February 2026) and ruled the society cannot demand flat agreement submission for renovation NOC while disputes remain pending, keeping all contentions on deposit amounts open. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Bombay High Court disposed of the contempt petition, finding no obstruction by respondents regarding flat occupation. The court directed the City Civil Court registry to accept deposit of arrears in monthly compensation (June 2025-February 2026) and ruled the society cannot demand flat agreement submission for renovation NOC while disputes remain pending, keeping all contentions on deposit amounts open. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts