DEEPAK SHAMJI NEGANDHI THROUGH POA BINDU NEGHANDHI vs ASHISH DINESH PARIKH — CP/259/2026
Case under Contempt of Courts Act Section .15. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 05th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010197972026
e-Filing Number
17-04-2026
Filing Number
CP/11521/2026
Filing Date
18-Apr-2026
Registration No
CP/259/2026
Registration Date
23-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne
Bench Type
Single
Category
CONTEMPT OF COURT ( 8 )
Sub-Category
CIVIL CONTEMPT ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DEEPAK SHAMJI NEGANDHI THROUGH POA BINDU NEGHANDHI
Adv. KHANJAVEDAKHTAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.ASHISH DINESH PARIKH
-
2.FALGUNI ASHISH PAREKH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF
The Bombay High Court disposed of the contempt petition, finding no obstruction by respondents regarding flat occupation. The court directed the City Civil Court registry to accept deposit of arrears in monthly compensation (June 2025-February 2026) and ruled the society cannot demand flat agreement submission for renovation NOC while disputes remain pending, keeping all contentions on deposit amounts open. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
For Direction
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne
-
30-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF
-
30-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CP/259/2026
The Bombay High Court disposed of the contempt petition, finding no obstruction by respondents regarding flat occupation. The court directed the City Civil Court registry to accept deposit of arrears in monthly compensation (June 2025-February 2026) and ruled the society cannot demand flat agreement submission for renovation NOC while disputes remain pending, keeping all contentions on deposit amounts open. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts