FRANK KENNETH EZI vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — IA/1355/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 07th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM010197782026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

IA/8265/2026

Filing Date

18-04-2026

Registration No

IA/1355/2026

Registration Date

21-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI

Bench Type

Single

Category

BAIL ( 51 )

Sub-Category

Modification ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

07th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Narcotics Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act Section 8(C), 22(C)

Petitioner(s)

FRANK KENNETH EZI

Adv. KHAN SHERALI SHAKHIBGUL

Respondent(s)

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI

07-05-2026

FOR CIRCULATION -1

Orders

07-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI

Case Summary: IA/1355/2026 - Frank Kenneth Ezi v. State of Maharashtra Frank Kenneth Ezi sought modification of his bail conditions to remove the requirement of furnishing local sureties (Rs. 50,000), arguing he was unable to procure them despite bail being granted. The High Court of Bombay dismissed the application, finding the surety condition was deliberately imposed to ensure the applicant's availability during trial in an NDPS Act case with flight risk concerns, and no justification existed to modify it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: IA/1355/2026 - Frank Kenneth Ezi v. State of Maharashtra Frank Kenneth Ezi sought modification of his bail conditions to remove the requirement of furnishing local sureties (Rs. 50,000), arguing he was unable to procure them despite bail being granted. The High Court of Bombay dismissed the application, finding the surety condition was deliberately imposed to ensure the applicant's availability during trial in an NDPS Act case with flight risk concerns, and no justification existed to modify it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case