PRAKASH KESHAV DHAGE AND ANR vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. THE G. P. AND ORS — WP/6059/2026

Case under Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Sr. Citizen Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 04th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM010197412026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WP/11498/2026

Filing Date

18-04-2026

Registration No

WP/6059/2026

Registration Date

30-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

Orders passed by Quasi Judicial Authority Other than Labour and Industrial Court ( 105 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

04th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Sr. Citizen Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

PRAKASH KESHAV DHAGE AND ANR

Adv. Shubham Vasekar

SUNITA PRAKASH DHAGE

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. THE G. P. AND ORS

THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COLLECTOR

THE SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE

KESHAVRAO KRUSHNARAO DHAGE

RAKESH SUNIL BHOSALE

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR

04-05-2026

FRESH ADMISSION

Orders

04-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR

The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Prakash Keshav Dhage and another challenging the Appellate Tribunal's order upholding a Maintenance Tribunal decision. The court held that regardless of ongoing property partition litigation between the petitioners and the 95-year-old respondent (petitioner's father), the petitioners have a bounden duty to provide adequate residence and maintenance to the senior citizen in a peaceful and dignified manner under the Senior Citizens Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Prakash Keshav Dhage and another challenging the Appellate Tribunal's order upholding a Maintenance Tribunal decision. The court held that regardless of ongoing property partition litigation between the petitioners and the 95-year-old respondent (petitioner's father), the petitioners have a bounden duty to provide adequate residence and maintenance to the senior citizen in a peaceful and dignified manner under the Senior Citizens Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case