PRAKASH KESHAV DHAGE AND ANR vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. THE G. P. AND ORS — WP/6059/2026

Case under Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Sr. Citizen Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010197412026

Filing Number

WP/11498/2026

Filing Date

18-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/6059/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

Orders passed by Quasi Judicial Authority Other than Labour and Industrial Court ( 105 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Sr. Citizen Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRAKASH KESHAV DHAGE AND ANR

    Adv. Shubham Vasekar

  2. 2.SUNITA PRAKASH DHAGE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. THE G. P. AND ORS

  2. 2.THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COLLECTOR

  3. 3.THE SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE

  4. 4.KESHAVRAO KRUSHNARAO DHAGE

  5. 5.RAKESH SUNIL BHOSALE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. JamadarView PDF

    The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Prakash Keshav Dhage and another challenging the Appellate Tribunal's order upholding a Maintenance Tribunal decision. The court held that regardless of ongoing property partition litigation between the petitioners and the 95-year-old respondent (petitioner's father), the petitioners have a bounden duty to provide adequate residence and maintenance to the senior citizen in a peaceful and dignified manner under the Senior Citizens Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

  4. 18-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/6059/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Prakash Keshav Dhage and another challenging the Appellate Tribunal's order upholding a Maintenance Tribunal decision. The court held that regardless of ongoing property partition litigation between the petitioners and the 95-year-old respondent (petitioner's father), the petitioners have a bounden duty to provide adequate residence and maintenance to the senior citizen in a peaceful and dignified manner under the Senior Citizens Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case