SAHIL MOHANLAL JAIN vs CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ECONOMIC OFFENCE BRANCH AND ANR — BA/1838/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed To be withdrawn on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 24-Apr-2026

CNR: HCBM010195492026

Filing Number

BA/8164/2026

Filing Date

17-Apr-2026

Registration No

BA/1838/2026

Registration Date

18-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi

Bench Type

Single

Category

BAIL ( 51 )

Sub-Category

Regular ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed To be withdrawn

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 61(2),318,336,340
Information Technology Act Section 66,66(D)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAHIL MOHANLAL JAIN

    Adv. WAQAR NASIR PATHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ECONOMIC OFFENCE BRANCH AND ANR

  2. 2.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. JoshiView PDF

    The Bombay High Court dismissed Sahil Mohanlal Jain's bail application as withdrawn, after his counsel informed the court that the Trial Court had already granted bail to the accused during the pendency of the High Court application. The applicant was granted liberty to file a fresh application before the Trial Court if necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Fresh Admission (Bail Applications)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi

  4. 24-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. JoshiView PDF

  5. 24-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 17-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. BA/1838/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court dismissed Sahil Mohanlal Jain's bail application as withdrawn, after his counsel informed the court that the Trial Court had already granted bail to the accused during the pendency of the High Court application. The applicant was granted liberty to file a fresh application before the Trial Court if necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case