HIMANSHU RANA @ MOHIT KAUSHIK vs UNION OF INDIA AND ANR — APEAL/363/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415(2),415. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM010194832026

Next Hearing

09th June 2026

Filing Number

APEAL/8122/2026

Filing Date

17-04-2026

Registration No

APEAL/363/2026

Registration Date

17-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI

Bench Type

Single

Category

CRIMINAL APPEAL ( 58 )

Sub-Category

Against Conviction - By Convicted Person - in Jail - Through Jail ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415(2),415
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Amendment) Act 1988 Section 22(c),23(c)r/w,8(c),30,r/w,22(c)

Petitioner(s)

HIMANSHU RANA @ MOHIT KAUSHIK

Adv. Taraq Sayed

Respondent(s)

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR

State of Maharashtra

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI

23-04-2026

FRESH ADMISSION

09-06-2026

FRESH ADMISSION

Orders

23-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 363 OF 2026 - SUMMARY In this criminal appeal before the Bombay High Court, appellant Himanshu Rana @ Mohit Kaushik challenged a lower court decision against the Union of India and State of Maharashtra. On 23rd April 2026, Justice R. M. Joshi issued notice to Respondent No. 1, while the State waived notice. The case was adjourned to 9th June 2026 for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 363 OF 2026 - SUMMARY In this criminal appeal before the Bombay High Court, appellant Himanshu Rana @ Mohit Kaushik challenged a lower court decision against the Union of India and State of Maharashtra. On 23rd April 2026, Justice R. M. Joshi issued notice to Respondent No. 1, while the State waived notice. The case was adjourned to 9th June 2026 for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case