Ms Teirth Developers and Suyojit Infrastructure Ltd Parinam Law Associates vs Suresh Trimbak Hattekar — WP/5369/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: HCBM010194272026

Next Hearing

: -

e-Filing Number

16-04-2026

Filing Number

WP/11334/2026

Filing Date

17-04-2026

Registration No

WP/5369/2026

Registration Date

18-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE GAUTAM A. ANKHAD

Coram

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE GAUTAM A. ANKHAD

Bench Type

Division

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 227
Consumer Protection Act

Petitioner(s)

Ms Teirth Developers and Suyojit Infrastructure Ltd Parinam Law Associates

Ms Teirth Developers

Adv. Parinam Law Associates

Suyojit Infrastructure Ltd

Adv. Parinam Law Associates

Respondent(s)

Suresh Trimbak Hattekar

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE GAUTAM A. ANKHAD

24-04-2026

FOR CIRCULATION

06-05-2026

FOR CIRCULATION

24-07-2026

FOR CIRCULATION

Orders

06-05-2026
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE GAUTAM A. ANKHAD

Summary of WP/5369/2026 Six consolidated writ petitions filed by Teirth Developers & Suyojit Infrastructure Ltd against multiple respondents were heard by the Bombay High Court on 6th May 2026. The Court directed the Registry to verify and place all these matters before the appropriate Court for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of WP/5369/2026 Six consolidated writ petitions filed by Teirth Developers & Suyojit Infrastructure Ltd against multiple respondents were heard by the Bombay High Court on 6th May 2026. The Court directed the Registry to verify and place all these matters before the appropriate Court for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case