UVAIS AHMED ABDUL TAYAB PATRAWALA AND ANR vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR — APL/792/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010194182026

Filing Number

APL/8092/2026

Filing Date

17-Apr-2026

Registration No

APL/792/2026

Registration Date

18-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe

Bench Type

Single

Category

CRIMINAL ( 9 )

Sub-Category

Quashing FIR, C.R., Charge Sheet - Crime against Women and Children ( 106 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UVAIS AHMED ABDUL TAYAB PATRAWALA AND ANR

    Adv. JG SHETTY

  2. 2.JAAN ASLAM SHAH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

  2. 2.MRS XYZ

    Adv. A A Khan

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Jul-2026

    At 3.00 P.M.

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe

  3. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. BhobeView PDF

    Summary of APL/792/2026 The Bombay High Court quashed FIR No. 48/2026 and the resulting chargesheet (Case 277/PW/2026) registered against nephews Uvais Ahmed Abdul Tayab Patrawala and Jaan Aslam Shah for offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Information Technology Act, 2000. The court found that the family dispute between the nephews and their aunt (Respondent No. 2) was amicably settled, with the complainant affirming before the magistrate and in a court affidavit that she had no grievance against the applicants and did not wish to pursue criminal proceedings. Following Supreme Court precedent permitting quashing where the victim has settled and withdrawn allegations, the court allowed the application subject to exemplary costs of Rs. 1,00,000 each imposed on both applicants and Rs. 1,00,000 on the respondent complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 24-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. BhobeView PDF

  5. 24-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 17-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. APL/792/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of APL/792/2026 The Bombay High Court quashed FIR No. 48/2026 and the resulting chargesheet (Case 277/PW/2026) registered against nephews Uvais Ahmed Abdul Tayab Patrawala and Jaan Aslam Shah for offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Information Technology Act, 2000. The court found that the family dispute between the nephews and their aunt (Respondent No. 2) was amicably settled, with the complainant affirming before the magistrate and in a court affidavit that she had no grievance against the applicants and did not wish to pursue criminal proceedings. Following Supreme Court precedent permitting quashing where the victim has settled and withdrawn allegations, the court allowed the application subject to exemplary costs of Rs. 1,00,000 each imposed on both applicants and Rs. 1,00,000 on the respondent complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case