REGENCY INC vs COLLECTOR DISTRICT THANE AND ORS — WP/5536/2026

Case under Mah. Land Revenue Code, 1966 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 27th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010193812026

Filing Number

WP/11305/2026

Filing Date

17-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/5536/2026

Registration Date

22-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

Bench Type

Single

Category

LAND REVENUE CODE MATTERS ( 57 )

Sub-Category

Single Bench ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

27-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Mah. Land Revenue Code, 1966 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.REGENCY INC

    Adv. Druti Datar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.COLLECTOR DISTRICT THANE AND ORS

  2. 2.TAHSILDAR AND EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE THANE

  3. 3.CIRCLE OFFICER, BELAPUR

  4. 4.NAVI MUMBAI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THRO ITS COMMISSIONER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

  3. 27-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

    Case Summary: Regency Inc v. Collector District Thane (WP 5536/2026) The Bombay High Court allowed Regency Inc's petition, setting aside penalty orders for alleged illegal excavation during construction of the "Regency Palms" project in Thane. The court found that the inspection report and panchanama (official record) on which the ₹5.13 crore penalty was based actually proved the excavated earth remained on-site—not that it was illegally transported—making the penalty legally unsustainable under Section 48(7) of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 27-Apr-2026

    For Orders--

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

  6. 23-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

  7. 23-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 17-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/5536/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Regency Inc v. Collector District Thane (WP 5536/2026) The Bombay High Court allowed Regency Inc's petition, setting aside penalty orders for alleged illegal excavation during construction of the "Regency Palms" project in Thane. The court found that the inspection report and panchanama (official record) on which the ₹5.13 crore penalty was based actually proved the excavated earth remained on-site—not that it was illegally transported—making the penalty legally unsustainable under Section 48(7) of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case