TUKARAM BHAGUJI KOKANE AND ANR vs THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER IGATPURI AND ORS — WP/5987/2026

Case under Right to Fair Compensation & Transparency in Land Acquisition,rehabilitation & Resettlement Act,2013 Section NA. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

Next hearing 16-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM010193692026

Filing Number

WP/11301/2026

Filing Date

17-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/5987/2026

Registration Date

29-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

Bench Type

Division

Category

LAND ACQUISITION/REQUISITION(CENTRAL/STATE) ( 20 )

Sub-Category

COMPENSATION ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Right to Fair Compensation & Transparency in Land Acquisition,rehabilitation & Resettlement Act,2013 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TUKARAM BHAGUJI KOKANE AND ANR

    Adv. RAMESHWAR NAVANATH GITE

  2. 2.RANGNATH BHAGUJI KOKANE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER IGATPURI AND ORS

  2. 2.THE COLLECTOR NASHIK

  3. 3.THE MAHARASHTRA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

    Adv. Jay and Co

  4. 4.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE MINISTRY FOR INDUSTRIES TO BE SERVED THR. AGP

Case History

  1. 16-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    High On Board -

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

  3. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/5987/2026 The Bombay High Court admitted these consolidated writ petitions challenging the Sub-Divisional Officer's (SDO) orders of 22.02.2026 rejecting landowners' objections to land acquisition for an industrial estate. The court found the SDO prima facie failed to comply with earlier court directions requiring detailed consideration of objections and consultation with Gram Sabhas and Panchayat Samitis. The court issued notice returnable 16.06.2026 and granted ad-interim relief maintaining status quo on possession and mutation entries pending final hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/5987/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/5987/2026 The Bombay High Court admitted these consolidated writ petitions challenging the Sub-Divisional Officer's (SDO) orders of 22.02.2026 rejecting landowners' objections to land acquisition for an industrial estate. The court found the SDO prima facie failed to comply with earlier court directions requiring detailed consideration of objections and consultation with Gram Sabhas and Panchayat Samitis. The court issued notice returnable 16.06.2026 and granted ad-interim relief maintaining status quo on possession and mutation entries pending final hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case