TUKARAM VITTHAL SHELAR vs THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER IGATPURI AND ORS — WP/5996/2026
Case under Right to Fair Compensation & Transparency in Land Acquisition,rehabilitation & Resettlement Act,2013 Section NA. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010193682026
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
Filing Number
WP/11300/2026
Filing Date
17-04-2026
Registration No
WP/5996/2026
Registration Date
29-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
Bench Type
Division
Category
LAND ACQUISITION/REQUISITION(CENTRAL/STATE) ( 20 )
Sub-Category
COMPENSATION ( 8 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
TUKARAM VITTHAL SHELAR
Adv. RAMESHWAR NAVANATH GITE
Respondent(s)
THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER IGATPURI AND ORS
THE COLLECTOR NASHIK
THE MAHARASHTRA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
Adv. Jay and Co
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. THE MINISTRY FOR INDUSTRIES
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
HIGH ON BOARD -
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-06-2026 | HIGH ON BOARD - |
Orders
The Bombay High Court issued notice (returnable 16.06.2026) in WP/5996/2026 and related petitions challenging SDO Nashik's rejection of objections to land acquisition for industrial estate formation. The Court granted ad-interim relief maintaining status quo on possession and mutation entries, finding prima facie that the SDO failed to comply with prior court directions requiring detailed discussion of grievances and consideration of Gram Sabha/Panchayat Samiti objections under the Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Bombay High Court issued notice (returnable 16.06.2026) in WP/5996/2026 and related petitions challenging SDO Nashik's rejection of objections to land acquisition for industrial estate formation. The Court granted ad-interim relief maintaining status quo on possession and mutation entries, finding prima facie that the SDO failed to comply with prior court directions requiring detailed discussion of grievances and consideration of Gram Sabha/Panchayat Samiti objections under the Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts