TUKARAM VITTHAL SHELAR vs THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER IGATPURI AND ORS — WP/5996/2026
Case under Right to Fair Compensation & Transparency in Land Acquisition,rehabilitation & Resettlement Act,2013 Section NA. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010193682026
Filing Number
WP/11300/2026
Filing Date
17-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP/5996/2026
Registration Date
29-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat
Bench Type
Division
Category
LAND ACQUISITION/REQUISITION(CENTRAL/STATE) ( 20 )
Sub-Category
COMPENSATION ( 8 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.TUKARAM VITTHAL SHELAR
Adv. RAMESHWAR NAVANATH GITE
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER IGATPURI AND ORS
-
2.THE COLLECTOR NASHIK
-
3.THE MAHARASHTRA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
Adv. Jay and Co
-
4.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. THE MINISTRY FOR INDUSTRIES
Case History
-
16-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
16-Jun-2026
High On Board -
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF
The Bombay High Court issued notice (returnable 16.06.2026) in WP/5996/2026 and related petitions challenging SDO Nashik's rejection of objections to land acquisition for industrial estate formation. The Court granted ad-interim relief maintaining status quo on possession and mutation entries, finding prima facie that the SDO failed to comply with prior court directions requiring detailed discussion of grievances and consideration of Gram Sabha/Panchayat Samiti objections under the Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/5996/2026
The Bombay High Court issued notice (returnable 16.06.2026) in WP/5996/2026 and related petitions challenging SDO Nashik's rejection of objections to land acquisition for industrial estate formation. The Court granted ad-interim relief maintaining status quo on possession and mutation entries, finding prima facie that the SDO failed to comply with prior court directions requiring detailed discussion of grievances and consideration of Gram Sabha/Panchayat Samiti objections under the Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts