ROHIDAS PANDHARINATH SHELAR AND ORS vs THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER IGATPURI AND ORS — WP/5993/2026

Case under Right to Fair Compensation & Transparency in Land Acquisition,rehabilitation & Resettlement Act,2013 Section NA. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

Next hearing 16-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM010193662026

Filing Number

WP/11299/2026

Filing Date

17-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/5993/2026

Registration Date

29-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

Bench Type

Division

Category

LAND ACQUISITION/REQUISITION(CENTRAL/STATE) ( 20 )

Sub-Category

COMPENSATION ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Right to Fair Compensation & Transparency in Land Acquisition,rehabilitation & Resettlement Act,2013 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ROHIDAS PANDHARINATH SHELAR AND ORS

    Adv. RAMESHWAR NAVANATH GITE

  2. 2.DEVIDAS PANDHARINATH SHELAR

  3. 3.ANKUSH PANDHARINATH SHELAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER IGATPURI AND ORS

  2. 2.THE COLLECTOR, NASHIK

  3. 3.THE MAHARASHTRA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

    Adv. Jay and Co

  4. 4.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR THE MINISTRY FOR INDUSTRIAL

Case History

  1. 16-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    High On Board -

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

  3. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/5993/2026 The Bombay High Court admitted multiple consolidated writ petitions challenging the Sub-Divisional Officer's rejection orders dated 22.02.2026 regarding land acquisition objections. The Court found the SDO prima facie failed to comply with prior court directions (01.10.2025) requiring detailed consideration of petitioner objections and Gram Sabha/Panchayat Samiti input under Section 32(2) of the Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961. The petition was adjourned to 16.06.2026, with status quo maintained on possession and mutation entries as interim relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/5993/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/5993/2026 The Bombay High Court admitted multiple consolidated writ petitions challenging the Sub-Divisional Officer's rejection orders dated 22.02.2026 regarding land acquisition objections. The Court found the SDO prima facie failed to comply with prior court directions (01.10.2025) requiring detailed consideration of petitioner objections and Gram Sabha/Panchayat Samiti input under Section 32(2) of the Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961. The petition was adjourned to 16.06.2026, with status quo maintained on possession and mutation entries as interim relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case