SAMPAT KALU KOKANE vs THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER IGATPURI AND ORS — HCBM10193622026

Case under Right to Fair Compensation & Transparency in Land Acquisition,rehabilitation & Resettlement Act,2013. Next hearing: 05th May 2026.

Next hearing 05-May-2026

CNR: HCBM010193622026

Filing Number

WP/11296/2026

Filing Date

17-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

Bench Type

Division

Category

LAND ACQUISITION/REQUISITION(CENTRAL/STATE) ( 20 )

Sub-Category

COMPENSATION ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Right to Fair Compensation & Transparency in Land Acquisition,rehabilitation & Resettlement Act,2013

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAMPAT KALU KOKANE

    Adv. RAMESHWAR NAVANATH GITE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER IGATPURI AND ORS

  2. 2.THE COLLECTOR, NASHIK

  3. 3.THE MAHARASHTRA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

  4. 4.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR THE MINISTRY FOR INDUSTRIAL

Case History

  1. 05-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    High On Board -

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

  3. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF

    The case description provided does not match the actual court document. The document shows Chaya Dattu Gunjal v. The Sub-divisional Officer, Nashik (not Sampat Kalu Kokane), involving 17 consolidated writ petitions challenging SDO orders rejecting land acquisition objections. The High Court of Bombay found prima facie non-compliance with its prior directions and granted ad-interim relief maintaining status quo on possession and mutation entries pending next hearing on 16.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

The case description provided does not match the actual court document. The document shows Chaya Dattu Gunjal v. The Sub-divisional Officer, Nashik (not Sampat Kalu Kokane), involving 17 consolidated writ petitions challenging SDO orders rejecting land acquisition objections. The High Court of Bombay found prima facie non-compliance with its prior directions and granted ad-interim relief maintaining status quo on possession and mutation entries pending next hearing on 16.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case