PUSHPA BHUPENDRA SHAH vs SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER AND ORS — WP/6208/2026
Case under Right to Fair Compensation & Transparency in Land Acquisition,rehabilitation & Resettlement Act,2013 Section NA. Next hearing: 13th July 2026.
CNR: HCBM010193422026
Next Hearing
13th July 2026
Filing Number
WP/11283/2026
Filing Date
17-04-2026
Registration No
WP/6208/2026
Registration Date
04-05-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
Bench Type
Division
Category
LAND ACQUISITION/REQUISITION(CENTRAL/STATE) ( 20 )
Sub-Category
COMPENSATION ( 8 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PUSHPA BHUPENDRA SHAH
Adv. NARAYAN BUBNA
Respondent(s)
SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER AND ORS
COLLECTOR THANE
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY MINISTRY OF REVENUE
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
FRESH ADMISSION
HIGH ON BOARD -
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-06-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION |
| 13-07-2026 | HIGH ON BOARD - |
Orders
Case Summary - WP 6208/2026: The Bombay High Court admitted the writ petition by Pushpa Bhupendra Shah against the Sub Divisional Officer, Bhiwandi and other state authorities. The court granted leave to amend the petition to add the acquiring body as a party respondent and issued notice returnable on 13th July 2026. The petition was tagged with WP 6233/2026, and the petitioner was permitted to serve the newly added respondent by private service. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary - WP 6208/2026: The Bombay High Court admitted the writ petition by Pushpa Bhupendra Shah against the Sub Divisional Officer, Bhiwandi and other state authorities. The court granted leave to amend the petition to add the acquiring body as a party respondent and issued notice returnable on 13th July 2026. The petition was tagged with WP 6233/2026, and the petitioner was permitted to serve the newly added respondent by private service. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts