SHRI. RAKESH KASHINATH MITKARI vs SHRI. PANDHIRANATH NAMDEO BHUNDE AND ORS. — HCBM10193172026
Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 104. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCBM010193172026
Filing Number
IA/11265/2026
Filing Date
17-Apr-2026
Bench Type
Single
Category
CIVIL APPEALS ( 45 )
Sub-Category
Single Bench Matters ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 27-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHRI. RAKESH KASHINATH MITKARI
Adv. KAYVAL P SHAH
Respondent(s)
-
1.SHRI. PANDHIRANATH NAMDEO BHUNDE AND ORS.
-
2.SHRI. AMIT PRAKASH DHAGDE
-
3.SHRI. PRASHANT RAMESHCHANDRA SAMDHANI
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
23-Sep-2026
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav
-
17-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF
Case Summary: Rakesh Kashinath Mitkari v. Pandharinath Namdeo Bhunde & Ors. Outcome: Appeal adjourned; notice issued to respondents returnable 07.05.2026. Appellant sought status quo order over property purchased under MOU dated 02.09.2021 for Rs. 1,15,00,000. Plaintiff paid Rs. 1,06,00,000 but defendant returned Rs. 36,00,000 and agreed to return balance. Defendant meanwhile sold property to third party. Court imposed interim restriction preventing defendants from creating further third-party rights pending final hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Apr-2026
Case filed
Case Summary: Rakesh Kashinath Mitkari v. Pandharinath Namdeo Bhunde & Ors. Outcome: Appeal adjourned; notice issued to respondents returnable 07.05.2026. Appellant sought status quo order over property purchased under MOU dated 02.09.2021 for Rs. 1,15,00,000. Plaintiff paid Rs. 1,06,00,000 but defendant returned Rs. 36,00,000 and agreed to return balance. Defendant meanwhile sold property to third party. Court imposed interim restriction preventing defendants from creating further third-party rights pending final hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts