PARASMANI KASHIRAM MORE PATIL VINOD PRAKASH vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY — WP/5087/2026
Case under Right of Persons with Disabilities Act Section NA. Disposed: --Disposed Off on 07th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010192942026
Filing Number
XFER/11246/2026
Filing Date
27-Jan-2026
Registration No
WP/5087/2026
Registration Date
06-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten Shamrao Venegavkar
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten Shamrao Venegavkar
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--Disposed Off
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PARASMANI KASHIRAM MORE PATIL VINOD PRAKASH
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
-
2.THE DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER
-
3.THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
-
4.THE DY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER (GAD)
-
5.THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER
-
6.THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten Shamrao VenegavkarView PDF
The Bombay High Court disposed of WP 5087/2026 and consolidated related petitions by granting the same interim relief previously awarded to identically placed petitioners in the lead judgment of WP 4325/2026 (Santosh Hiraman Lashkare). The court applied consistent reasoning and directions from the earlier extensive judgment to all pending petitions without detailing the specific merits in this order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
Fresh Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten Shamrao Venegavkar
-
28-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten Shamrao VenegavkarView PDF
-
28-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/5087/2026
The Bombay High Court disposed of WP 5087/2026 and consolidated related petitions by granting the same interim relief previously awarded to identically placed petitioners in the lead judgment of WP 4325/2026 (Santosh Hiraman Lashkare). The court applied consistent reasoning and directions from the earlier extensive judgment to all pending petitions without detailing the specific merits in this order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts