PARASMANI KASHIRAM MORE PATIL VINOD PRAKASH vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY — WP/5087/2026

Case under Right of Persons with Disabilities Act Section NA. Disposed: --Disposed Off on 07th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM010192942026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

XFER/11246/2026

Filing Date

27-01-2026

Registration No

WP/5087/2026

Registration Date

06-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVINDRA V. GHUGE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HITEN SHAMRAO VENEGAVKAR

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVINDRA V. GHUGE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HITEN SHAMRAO VENEGAVKAR

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

07th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

Right of Persons with Disabilities Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

PARASMANI KASHIRAM MORE PATIL VINOD PRAKASH

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

THE DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER

THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

THE DY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER (GAD)

THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER

THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVINDRA V. GHUGE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HITEN SHAMRAO VENEGAVKAR

28-04-2026

FRESH ADMISSION

07-05-2026

FRESH ADMISSION

Orders

07-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVINDRA V. GHUGE,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HITEN SHAMRAO VENEGAVKAR

The Bombay High Court disposed of WP 5087/2026 and consolidated related petitions by granting the same interim relief previously awarded to identically placed petitioners in the lead judgment of WP 4325/2026 (Santosh Hiraman Lashkare). The court applied consistent reasoning and directions from the earlier extensive judgment to all pending petitions without detailing the specific merits in this order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court disposed of WP 5087/2026 and consolidated related petitions by granting the same interim relief previously awarded to identically placed petitioners in the lead judgment of WP 4325/2026 (Santosh Hiraman Lashkare). The court applied consistent reasoning and directions from the earlier extensive judgment to all pending petitions without detailing the specific merits in this order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case