SHABNAM UMAR KHAN vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU OFFICER AND ANR — WP/5385/2026

Case under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 23rd April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010191702026

Filing Number

WP/11169/2026

Filing Date

16-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/5385/2026

Registration Date

18-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

Bench Type

Single

Category

RENT ACT ( 34 )

Sub-Category

ENHANCEMENT OF RENT ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

23-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHABNAM UMAR KHAN

    Adv. RINKY KANOJIA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU OFFICER AND ANR

  2. 2.KHAN IMRAN GULAB AYUB

    Adv. Ram Ugrah Singh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF

    Case Summary: The High Court of Bombay rejected Shabnam Umar Khan's writ petition challenging an execution order dated 17 March 2026. The court held that the underlying eviction order (issued 4 January 2024, confirmed on revision 16 July 2024, and upheld by the court on 18 September 2024) had attained finality, making it binding for execution. Finding no infirmity in the impugned execution order and rejecting attempts to raise new points at the execution stage, the court dismissed both the petition and interim application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/5385/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court of Bombay rejected Shabnam Umar Khan's writ petition challenging an execution order dated 17 March 2026. The court held that the underlying eviction order (issued 4 January 2024, confirmed on revision 16 July 2024, and upheld by the court on 18 September 2024) had attained finality, making it binding for execution. Finding no infirmity in the impugned execution order and rejecting attempts to raise new points at the execution stage, the court dismissed both the petition and interim application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case