BHARATI CHANDRAKANT TANDEL SHRI. MANDAR KULKARNI vs SHAMSHAD USMAN TAMBE AND ANR — FA/501/2011

Case under Motor Vehicles Act,1939. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 15-Dec-2010

CNR: HCBM010191692010

Filing Number

FA/13051/2010

Filing Date

07-May-2010

Registration No

FA/501/2011

Registration Date

15-Mar-2011

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

Bench Type

Single

Category

COMPENSATION ( 7 )

Sub-Category

MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIM OTHER INJURY ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act,1939

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHARATI CHANDRAKANT TANDEL SHRI. MANDAR KULKARNI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHAMSHAD USMAN TAMBE AND ANR

  2. 2.THE NATIONAL INSURANCE CO.,

    Adv. poonam mital

  3. 3.SHRI KHAIMUDDIN TAJUDDIN,

  4. 4.UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO.LTD.

  5. 5.0

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal JainView PDF

    The Bombay High Court dismissed First Appeal No. 501 of 2011 filed by Bharati Chandrakant Tandel against Shamshad Usman Tambe and others for want of prosecution, as no counsel appeared on behalf of the appellant. The court granted liberty to the appellant to file an application for restoration of the appeal if sufficient cause is demonstrated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    At 3.00 P.M.

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

  4. 15-Dec-2010

    Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. OkaView PDF

  5. 15-Dec-2010

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 15-Dec-2010

    Notification

    Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Oka

  7. 07-May-2010

    Case filed

    Registration No. FA/501/2011

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court dismissed First Appeal No. 501 of 2011 filed by Bharati Chandrakant Tandel against Shamshad Usman Tambe and others for want of prosecution, as no counsel appeared on behalf of the appellant. The court granted liberty to the appellant to file an application for restoration of the appeal if sufficient cause is demonstrated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case