SHRAVAN KUMAR SATYAPAL vs THE SENIOR INSPECTOR OF POLICE AND ANR — ABA/1009/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 05th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010191532026
Filing Number
ABA/7994/2026
Filing Date
16-04-2026
Registration No
ABA/1009/2026
Registration Date
16-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ASHWIN D. BHOBE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ASHWIN D. BHOBE
Bench Type
Single
Category
BAIL ( 51 )
Sub-Category
Anticipatory ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
05th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHRAVAN KUMAR SATYAPAL
Adv. WAGH SWAPNIL LAXMAN
Respondent(s)
THE SENIOR INSPECTOR OF POLICE AND ANR
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ASHWIN D. BHOBE
FRESH ADMISSION (ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATIONS)
FRESH ADMISSION (ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATIONS)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-04-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION (ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATIONS) |
| 27-04-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION (ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATIONS) |
Orders
Case Summary: ABA/1009/2026 Decision: The Bombay High Court rejected Shravan Kumar Satyapal's anticipatory bail application, finding a strong prima facie case against him for fabricating bank guarantees and embezzling government project funds totaling Rs. 68.86 lakhs. The court determined custodial interrogation was warranted, rejecting the applicant's argument that lack of need for interrogation should justify bail. Key Facts: Satyapal, appointed as Project Head for a skill development company, allegedly misrepresented his influence, diverted project funds to his own entity, and forged a Rs. 35.28 crore bank guarantee for Bihar government projects. Evidence showed similar fraud patterns in Tripura, indicating habitual criminality. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: ABA/1009/2026 Decision: The Bombay High Court rejected Shravan Kumar Satyapal's anticipatory bail application, finding a strong prima facie case against him for fabricating bank guarantees and embezzling government project funds totaling Rs. 68.86 lakhs. The court determined custodial interrogation was warranted, rejecting the applicant's argument that lack of need for interrogation should justify bail. Key Facts: Satyapal, appointed as Project Head for a skill development company, allegedly misrepresented his influence, diverted project funds to his own entity, and forged a Rs. 35.28 crore bank guarantee for Bihar government projects. Evidence showed similar fraud patterns in Tripura, indicating habitual criminality. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts