YOGESHWAR CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY THR ITS CHAIRMAN MR. SUNIL SHRIDHAR DESHPANDEJ AND ORS.(Legal Heir) vs DAHANUKAR NAGAR SAHAKARI GRUHA RACHANA SANSTHA MARAYADIT ( INDRANAGARI) AND ANR. — HCBM10190602026
Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 115. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010190602026
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
Filing Number
CRA/11109/2026
Filing Date
16-04-2026
Judge
Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)
Coram
Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)
Bench Type
Single
Category
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATIONS ( 67 )
Sub-Category
Against Order of Civil Court (Except under Rent Act) ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
YOGESHWAR CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY THR ITS CHAIRMAN MR. SUNIL SHRIDHAR DESHPANDEJ AND ORS.(Legal Heir)
Adv. ADKINE NIKHIL VIJAY 1.
MR. SUNIL SHRIDHAR DESHPANDE CHAIRMAN1.
MR. PRASAD MAHADEO SANWATSARKAR SECRETARY1.
RAMESH KESHAV DHAVALIKAR
Respondent(s)
DAHANUKAR NAGAR SAHAKARI GRUHA RACHANA SANSTHA MARAYADIT ( INDRANAGARI) AND ANR.
PUNE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
Hearing History
Judge: Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)
For Notification (Objection Not Removed)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | For Notification (Objection Not Removed) |
Orders
In Civil Revision Application Stamp No. 11109 of 2026, the High Court of Bombay (Pune District) directed the Applicant's Advocate to remove office objections within two weeks as a final opportunity. The court warned that failure to comply would result in refusal of registration and necessary orders on the next date. The case was adjourned pending resolution of these procedural defects. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
In Civil Revision Application Stamp No. 11109 of 2026, the High Court of Bombay (Pune District) directed the Applicant's Advocate to remove office objections within two weeks as a final opportunity. The court warned that failure to comply would result in refusal of registration and necessary orders on the next date. The case was adjourned pending resolution of these procedural defects. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts