PARVATI PRABHAKAR NANDGAONKAR vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR MANAGER AND ORS — WP/5829/2026
Case under Government Premises (Eviction) Act (Maharashtra) Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 04th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010190562026
Filing Number
WP/11108/2026
Filing Date
16-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP/5829/2026
Registration Date
28-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar
Bench Type
Single
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )
Sub-Category
Orders passed by Quasi Judicial Authority Other than Labour and Industrial Court ( 105 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PARVATI PRABHAKAR NANDGAONKAR
Adv. Balasaheb Deshmukh
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR MANAGER AND ORS
-
2.SHALAN BALU SHIVGAD
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. JamadarView PDF
The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn after the petitioner sought permission to appeal the eviction order passed by the Competent Authority under the Maharashtra Government Premises (Eviction) Act, 1955. The court granted leave to withdraw with liberty to file an appeal before the Appellate Authority, permitting the petitioner to raise all contentions including that the eviction order (dated 28 April 2026) was passed without providing adequate hearing opportunity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Fresh Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar
-
16-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/5829/2026
The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn after the petitioner sought permission to appeal the eviction order passed by the Competent Authority under the Maharashtra Government Premises (Eviction) Act, 1955. The court granted leave to withdraw with liberty to file an appeal before the Appellate Authority, permitting the petitioner to raise all contentions including that the eviction order (dated 28 April 2026) was passed without providing adequate hearing opportunity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts