JAMIL KHAWAJA AKHTAR vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU G P AND ORS — WP/5076/2026

Case under Mah. Land Revenue Code, 1966 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010190442026

Filing Number

WP/11096/2026

Filing Date

16-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/5076/2026

Registration Date

16-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

Bench Type

Division

Category

LAND REVENUE CODE MATTERS ( 57 )

Sub-Category

Division Bench ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Mah. Land Revenue Code, 1966 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAMIL KHAWAJA AKHTAR

    Adv. ASHOK MISHRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU G P AND ORS

  2. 2.THE DIVISIONAL OFFICER

  3. 3.TEHSILDAR

  4. 4.YOGESH MACHINDAR MAPARI

  5. 5.DHANU MACHENDRA MAPAARI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF

    The Bombay High Court granted limited protection to petitioner Jamil Khawaja Akhtar against a demolition notice issued by the Circle Officer for allegedly unauthorized construction. The court directed that no coercive action be taken for four weeks, allowing the petitioner to pursue remedies before the Tahsildar, and directed that the pending civil suit proceed on its own merits without prejudice to either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    At 11.00 A.M.

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/5076/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court granted limited protection to petitioner Jamil Khawaja Akhtar against a demolition notice issued by the Circle Officer for allegedly unauthorized construction. The court directed that no coercive action be taken for four weeks, allowing the petitioner to pursue remedies before the Tahsildar, and directed that the pending civil suit proceed on its own merits without prejudice to either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case