JAMIL KHAWAJA AKHTAR vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU G P AND ORS — WP/5076/2026
Case under Mah. Land Revenue Code, 1966 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 17th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010190442026
Filing Number
WP/11096/2026
Filing Date
16-04-2026
Registration No
WP/5076/2026
Registration Date
16-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK
Bench Type
Division
Category
LAND REVENUE CODE MATTERS ( 57 )
Sub-Category
Division Bench ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
17th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JAMIL KHAWAJA AKHTAR
Adv. ASHOK MISHRA
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU G P AND ORS
THE DIVISIONAL OFFICER
TEHSILDAR
YOGESH MACHINDAR MAPARI
DHANU MACHENDRA MAPAARI
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK
AT 11.00 A.M.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | AT 11.00 A.M. |
Orders
The Bombay High Court granted limited protection to petitioner Jamil Khawaja Akhtar against a demolition notice issued by the Circle Officer for allegedly unauthorized construction. The court directed that no coercive action be taken for four weeks, allowing the petitioner to pursue remedies before the Tahsildar, and directed that the pending civil suit proceed on its own merits without prejudice to either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Bombay High Court granted limited protection to petitioner Jamil Khawaja Akhtar against a demolition notice issued by the Circle Officer for allegedly unauthorized construction. The court directed that no coercive action be taken for four weeks, allowing the petitioner to pursue remedies before the Tahsildar, and directed that the pending civil suit proceed on its own merits without prejudice to either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts