M/S. ARISTONE BUILDERS vs SANTOSH CHATURBHUJ SAMAL Advocate - TARUN, ( CAVEAT AND V.P. FILED ) — ARA/29/2026
Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 37. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010190192026
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
e-Filing Number
11-04-2026
Filing Number
ARA/11077/2026
Filing Date
16-04-2026
Registration No
ARA/29/2026
Registration Date
04-05-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN
Bench Type
Single
Category
ARBITRATION ( 4 )
Sub-Category
Arbitration Appeals - Single Bench ( 106 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M/S. ARISTONE BUILDERS
Adv. LAW GLOBAL
SHANKAR KUMAR JHA
Adv. JHA SUBHASH CHANDRA
Respondent(s)
SANTOSH CHATURBHUJ SAMAL Advocate - TARUN, ( CAVEAT AND V.P. FILED )
BRIJIESH DEVNARAYAN SINGH
Adv. TARUN,( CAVEAT AND V.P. FILED )
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN
AT 3.00 P.M.
AT 3.00 P.M.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | AT 3.00 P.M. |
| 12-06-2026 | AT 3.00 P.M. |
Orders
Case Summary: ARA/29/2026 The Bombay High Court adjourned the arbitration appeal challenging a Section 9 order on allegations of backdating. The court granted the respondents liberty to file a reply within three weeks, with a rejoinder permitted within one week thereafter, and stood over the matter to June 12, 2026. No intervention was made in the impugned order, leaving discretion with the arbitral tribunal to modify interlocutory relief as necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: ARA/29/2026 The Bombay High Court adjourned the arbitration appeal challenging a Section 9 order on allegations of backdating. The court granted the respondents liberty to file a reply within three weeks, with a rejoinder permitted within one week thereafter, and stood over the matter to June 12, 2026. No intervention was made in the impugned order, leaving discretion with the arbitral tribunal to modify interlocutory relief as necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts