THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD URMILA K. SANIL vs SMT. RUPALI NAVNATH KARDILE AND ORS — HCBM10190102013

Case under Motor Vehicles Act,1939 Section 173. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.

Next hearing 09-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM010190102013

Filing Number

FA/13294/2013

Filing Date

16-Apr-2013

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

Bench Type

Single

Category

COMPENSATION ( 7 )

Sub-Category

INSURER LIABILITY MATTERS ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act,1939 Section 173

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD URMILA K. SANIL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SMT. RUPALI NAVNATH KARDILE AND ORS

    Adv. R.D. SURYAWANSHI,R. NO. 6 1123

  2. 2.NAMITA NAVNATH KARDILE

    Adv. R.D. SURYAWANSHI R. NO.

  3. 3.VIJAYA NAVNATH KARDILE

    Adv. R.D. SURYAWANSHI R. NO.

  4. 4.LILABAI BACHU KARDILE

    Adv. R.D. SURYAWANSHI R. NO.

  5. 5.NARAYAN KASHINATH HIRE

    Adv. R.D. SURYAWANSHI R. NO.

  6. 6.MAHESH RAMESH DESHMUKH

    Adv. R.D. SURYAWANSHI R. NO. 6

Case History

  1. 09-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal JainView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay dismissed New India Assurance Co. Ltd.'s appeal challenging the Tribunal's order to pay Rs.4,03,474/- compensation to the dependents of Navnath Kardile, who died in a 2009 motorcycle-taxi accident. The insurer's claim that the taxi violated permit conditions by operating beyond 32 km was rejected, as evidence showed the distance restriction applied only to autorickshaws, not taxis. The insurer must pay claimants first but may recover from the vehicle owner if policy violations occurred. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2013

    Notification

    Registrar (Judicial - I)

  4. 16-Apr-2013

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay dismissed New India Assurance Co. Ltd.'s appeal challenging the Tribunal's order to pay Rs.4,03,474/- compensation to the dependents of Navnath Kardile, who died in a 2009 motorcycle-taxi accident. The insurer's claim that the taxi violated permit conditions by operating beyond 32 km was rejected, as evidence showed the distance restriction applied only to autorickshaws, not taxis. The insurer must pay claimants first but may recover from the vehicle owner if policy violations occurred. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case