ANIL JETHA DALVI AND ANR vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU SECRETARY AND ORS — WP/5952/2026
Case under Mah. Land Acquisition Act, 1949 Section NA. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010189942026
Next Hearing
29th June 2026
Filing Number
WP/11058/2026
Filing Date
16-04-2026
Registration No
WP/5952/2026
Registration Date
29-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
Bench Type
Division
Category
LAND ACQUISITION/REQUISITION(CENTRAL/STATE) ( 20 )
Sub-Category
COMPENSATION ( 8 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ANIL JETHA DALVI AND ANR
Adv. VKLex And Associate
VAIBHAV SHIVDAS KHULE
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU SECRETARY AND ORS
SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER-
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI
ASSISTANT MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
FRESH ADMISSION
HIGH ON BOARD -
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION |
| 29-06-2026 | HIGH ON BOARD - |
Orders
Case Summary: WP/5952/2026 Petitioners challenged the State of Maharashtra and BMC's alleged illegal possession of 6505 sq.mtrs. of land since 1972 without formal land acquisition proceedings or award. The High Court of Bombay adjourned the petition to 29.06.2026, directing respondents to file reply affidavits within six weeks. The court expressed concern about the 53-year delay in raising the claim and cautioned it would impose heavy costs if the allegations lack substance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP/5952/2026 Petitioners challenged the State of Maharashtra and BMC's alleged illegal possession of 6505 sq.mtrs. of land since 1972 without formal land acquisition proceedings or award. The High Court of Bombay adjourned the petition to 29.06.2026, directing respondents to file reply affidavits within six weeks. The court expressed concern about the 53-year delay in raising the claim and cautioned it would impose heavy costs if the allegations lack substance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts